Abstract:Purpose This study examines (1) the extent of key audit matters (KAMs) reported by auditors is related to accounting estimates, (2) whether measurement uncertainty and management bias affect auditors to do so and (3) whether the use of accounting estimates, given the measurement uncertainty and management bias reported in KAMs adversely affects the decision usefulness of accounting information. Design/methodology/approach Data on key audit matters, accounting estimates, measurement uncertainty, management bias, etc. were collected from the auditor's reports of 351 sample Chinese listed firms. It employs regression analyses to assess the hypotheses on issues affecting the report of these key audit matters and the impacts on the decision usefulness of accounting information. Findings Fair value and impairment loss estimations make up of 2.6 and 44.1% of the 606 KAMs identified, respectively. Measurement uncertainty is positively, while management bias is negatively, affecting auditors report KAMs related to accounting estimates. The use of accounting estimates in firms where their auditors reported the KAMs related to accounting estimates does not enhance the value and predictive relevance of reported earnings. The assurance works on, and reporting of, KAMs served as a “red flag” about the accounting estimates. Practical implications The use of accounting estimates does not always lead to enhanced decision-useful accounting information. Auditors, in their stewardship role, shall ensure that the measurement uncertainty issue is appropriately identified, addressed and verified. In addition, they shall provide an effective check-and-balance to the accounting discretion managers have in providing decision-useful information from opportunistic reporting. Originality/value This study examines the proposition that while the use of estimates can enhance the decision usefulness of accounting information, it can also induce measurement uncertainty and management bias into financial reporting.

The Impact of Financial Risk on Boilerplate of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

What underlies key audit matters? Evidence from Taiwan

The impact of key audit matters on goodwill accounting and investment behavior: Evidence from China

Informativeness of Key Audit Matters: Evidence from China

Research on the influence of key audit matters on the audit quality of commercial banks-Evidence from China

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Key audit matter disclosure and stock mispricing: Evidence from China

The effect of key audit matters on the association of credit risk and earnings quality

Critical Audit Matters: Possible Market Misinterpretation

Accounting Firm Organization Structure and Audit Risk Management: Evidence from Chinese Domestic Accounting Firms

The Effect of Reporting Key Audit Matters on Audit Fees and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Hong Kong

Investor reactions to key audit matters: Financial and non‐financial contexts

Measurement uncertainty and management bias in accounting estimates: the perspective of key audit matters reported by Chinese firms' auditors

Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies

Corporate Violations and Audit Opinions: Warning Effect or Uncovering Effect?

Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk

Auditor Legal Liability and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Organizational Transformation of Chinese Audit Firms

The Effect of KAMs Disclosure in the Extended Audit Report on Managerial Bad News Hoarding Behavior and Stock Price Crash Risk: The Role of Audit Firm Characteristics

Impact of Auditor Turnover on Stock Price Crash Risk: Insights from China's Capital Market

Unintended Effects of Critical Audit Matters: Early Evidence