Abstract:We examine which of two opposing financial reporting incentives that group-affiliated firms experience shapes their accounting transparency evident in auditor choice. In one direction, complex group structure and intra-group transactions enable controlling shareholders to pursue diversionary activities that they later hide by distorting reported earnings. In the other direction, as outside investors price protect against potential expropriation, controlling shareholders may be eager to improve financial reporting quality in order to alleviate agency costs. To empirically clarify whether group affiliation affects company insiders’ incentives to address minority shareholders’ concerns over agency costs, we examine auditor selection of group firms relative to stand-alone firms. In comparison to non-group firms, our evidence implies that group firms are more likely to appoint Top 10 audit firms in China, especially when their controlling shareholders have stronger incentives to improve external monitoring of the financial reporting process. After isolating group firms, we find that the presence of a Top 10 auditor translates into higher earnings and disclosure quality, higher valuation implications for related-party transactions, and cheaper equity financing, implying that these firms benefit from engaging a high-quality auditor. In additional analysis consistent with our predictions, we find that group firms that are Top 10 clients pay higher audit fees and their controlling shareholders are more constrained against meeting earnings benchmarks through intra-group transactions and siphoning corporate resources at the expense of minority investors. Collectively, our evidence supports the narrative that insiders in firms belonging to business groups weigh the costs and benefits stemming from auditor choice.

Auditor Legal Liability and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Organizational Transformation of Chinese Audit Firms

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Internal Control and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China

Impact of Auditor Turnover on Stock Price Crash Risk: Insights from China's Capital Market

Stock price crash risk and auditor-client contracting

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Mandatory audit partner rotation and stock price crash risk: causal evidence from a natural experiment

Stock Price Contagion Effects of Low-Quality Audits at the Individual Audit Partner Level

Restoring Trust among Investors after Shredded CPA Reputation: Evidence from China

Do auditor changes affect the disclosure of critical audit matters? Evidence from China

Reputation Mechanism of Auditor: Based on the Empirical Research of Audit Firm M&A

Buy, Lie, or Die: an Investigation of Chinese ST Firms’ Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence

Capital Market Consequences of Audit Office Size: Evidence from Stock Price Crash Risk

Accounting Firm Organization Structure and Audit Risk Management: Evidence from Chinese Domestic Accounting Firms

Audit Effort and Stock Price Crash Risk

Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings

Audit Market Consolidation and Client Innovation

Local Institutions, Audit Quality, and Corporate Scandals of US-Listed Foreign Firms

Auditor Competencies, Organizational Learning, and Audit Quality: Spillover Effects of Auditing Cross-Listed Clients

Auditor Choice and Its Implications for Group-Affiliated Firms