Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

Hong Jianqiao,Fang Junxiong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.04.014
2009-01-01
Abstract:Audit committee systems are presumed to be an effective corporate governance mechanism. There is much empirical evidence based on Chinese capital market data to support the conclusion that audit committee systems have improved the quality of accounting information. On the other hand, some theoretical papers describe fundamental problems within the environment of audit committees, such as system design and legal system aspects. Our research aims to further investigate the relationship between firms, audit committees and earnings quality, represented by the value relevance of earnings. Based on capital market data from 2002 to 2004, we investigate the effectiveness of audit committee mechanisms from the viewpoint of improving earning quality. Our main findings are: (1) based on cross-sectional data, the firms with audit committees show higher earnings quality. However, this higher earnings quality also existed before the setting up of the audit committee when compared to firms that choose not to set up an audit committee; (2) after controlling for the pre-setup difference in earnings quality, no difference is found in earnings quality between the firms with and without audit committees. Our findings do not suggest that audit committees have improved the quality of accounting information.Our results have an important implication for further research about the effectiveness of the audit committee system. We find that firms with higher earnings quality tend to set up audit committees. Researchers who hope to evaluate the effectiveness of audit committees should control for this self-selection effect. And more importantly, future research should test the effectiveness of audit committee systems from viewpoints other than earnings quality.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?