Abstract:We examine which of two opposing financial reporting incentives that group-affiliated firms experience shapes their accounting transparency evident in auditor choice. In one direction, complex group structure and intra-group transactions enable controlling shareholders to pursue diversionary activities that they later hide by distorting reported earnings. In the other direction, as outside investors price protect against potential expropriation, controlling shareholders may be eager to improve financial reporting quality in order to alleviate agency costs. To empirically clarify whether group affiliation affects company insiders’ incentives to address minority shareholders’ concerns over agency costs, we examine auditor selection of group firms relative to stand-alone firms. In comparison to non-group firms, our evidence implies that group firms are more likely to appoint Top 10 audit firms in China, especially when their controlling shareholders have stronger incentives to improve external monitoring of the financial reporting process. After isolating group firms, we find that the presence of a Top 10 auditor translates into higher earnings and disclosure quality, higher valuation implications for related-party transactions, and cheaper equity financing, implying that these firms benefit from engaging a high-quality auditor. In additional analysis consistent with our predictions, we find that group firms that are Top 10 clients pay higher audit fees and their controlling shareholders are more constrained against meeting earnings benchmarks through intra-group transactions and siphoning corporate resources at the expense of minority investors. Collectively, our evidence supports the narrative that insiders in firms belonging to business groups weigh the costs and benefits stemming from auditor choice.

On the Effort-Saving Effect of Audit Committee–auditor Interlocking

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Does Audit Partner Workload Compression Affect Audit Quality?

An Empirical Study on Knowledge Sharing, Affective Commitment, Perceived Task Interdependence and Job Involvement in Chinese Accounting Firms

Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

Audit committee-auditor interlocking and disclosure of key audit matters

Audit committee accounting financial expertise and stock price crash risk

The Effect of External Auditors on Managerial Slack

Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

The Impact of Audit Committee Strength on the Influence of Management Team Likeability

The Effect of Analyst-Auditor Connections on Analysts' Performance

The effect of auditor's cooperation with independent financial advisors on the reliability of performance commitment-Based on the moderating effect of managerial overconfidence

On the Benefits of Audit Market Consolidation: Evidence from Merged Audit Firms

Audit Effort and Stock Price Crash Risk

Does the adoption of artificial intelligence by audit firms and their clients affect audit quality and efficiency? Evidence from China

The Effects of Audit Firms' Knowledge Sharing on Audit Quality and Efficiency

The effects of audit partner pre-client and client-specific experience on audit quality and on perceptions of audit quality

Auditor Choice and Its Implications for Group-Affiliated Firms

Impacts of Mechanism of Blockholders Counterbalance on the Effectiveness of Auditing Constraints

Audit Effort and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Audit Firms’ Tax Adjustments in China

Auditor Concentration and the Impact of Interlocking Directorates