Abstract:In this study, we examine introductory physics students' ability to perform analogical reasoning between two isomorphic problems which employ the same underlying physics principles but have different surface features. Three hundred and eighty two students from a calculus-based and an algebra-based introductory physics course were asked to learn from a solved problem provided and take advantage of what they learned from it to solve another isomorphic problem (which we call the quiz problem). The solved problem provided has two sub-problems while the quiz problem has three sub-problems, which is known to be challenging for introductory students from previous research. In addition to the solved problem, students also received extra scaffolding supports that were intended to help them discern and exploit the underlying similarities of the isomorphic solved and quiz problems. The results suggest that students had great difficulty in transferring what they learned from a 2-step problem to a 3-step problem. Although most students were able to learn from the solved problem to some extent with the scaffolding provided and invoke the relevant principles in the quiz problem, they were not necessarily able to apply the principles correctly. We also conducted think-aloud interviews with 6 introductory students in order to understand in-depth the difficulties they had and explore strategies to provide better scaffolding. The interviews suggest that students often superficially mapped the principles employed in the solved problem to the quiz problem without necessarily understanding the governing conditions underlying each principle and examining the applicability of the principle in the new situation in an in-depth manner. Findings suggest that more scaffolding is needed to help students in transferring from a two-step problem to a three step problem and applying the physics principles appropriately.

To use or no to use diagrams: The effect of drawing a diagram in solving introductory physics problems

Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems

Investigating Unprompted and Prompted Diagrams Generated by Physics MajorsDuring Problem Solving

Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part II: An example from waves

Problem-appropriate diagram instruction for improving mathematical word problem solving

To Draw or Not to Draw? Examining the Necessity of Problem Diagrams Using Massive Open Online Course Experiments

Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers

Using Reflection with Peers to Help Students Learn Effective Problem Solving Strategies

What Diagrams Are Considered Useful for Solving Mathematical Word Problems in Japan?

Evaluation of a novel method for teaching drawing of histology diagrams to first year MBBS students

Drawing to learn: How producing graphical representations enhances scientific thinking.

Using Isomorphic Problems to Learn Introductory Physics

Using an Isomorphic Problem Pair to Learn Introductory Physics: Transferring from a Two-step Problem to a Three-step Problem

Problem-solving a lesson from relativity in physics education

Exercises are problems too: implications for teaching problem-solving in introductory physics courses

Causal diagramming to improve students' monitoring accuracy and text comprehension: Effects of diagram standards and self‐scoring instructions

Learning by drawing: When is it worth the time and effort?

Using Schema-Based Diagrams to Represent and Solve Word Problems: Relationship between Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Demonstration

Impact of Context-Rich, Multifaceted Problems on Students' Attitudes Towards Problem-Solving

Challenges in designing appropriate scaffolding to improve students' representational consistency: The case of a Gauss's law problem

Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment