Problem-solving a lesson from relativity in physics education

Claes Cramer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac5641

2022-04-12

Physics Education

Abstract:Abstract The principle of relativity is of fundamental importance in practice when we are solving problems in physics since the axiom states that the result of any physical experiment is the same when performed with identical initial conditions relative to any inertial coordinate system. Hence, conceptual knowledge of coordinate systems is central in any physics problem-solving framework. This opens up the question whether upper secondary school students should be taught to set up coordinate systems and apply basic coordinate transformations systematically when solving problems or if it should be left for physics courses at a college or university level? Given that working with coordinate systems does not require any advanced algebra or analysis knowledge, a case can be made for introducing the concepts of coordinate systems and transformations together with a uniform problem-solving framework. The purpose here, given that coordinate systems are central in problem-solving, is to revisit the method of drawing free body diagrams in engineering mechanics but adapted for upper secondary school physics. This method relies on the existence of a coordinate system and can be described by an activity diagram—a connected sequence of actions and decisions. The activity diagram is a map for problem-solving. The central actions in the activity are to introduce a coordinate system, draw a free body diagram and decide if the system should be transformed besides actually working out any algebra and numerical calculations. Here the notion of ‘transformation’ should be read as a graphical transformation rather than an algebraic group operation that is not suitable, neither to teach, nor to use at upper secondary level. A basic example is provided to illustrate why the methodology simplifies the problem-solving process and the student’s understanding of the subject.