Abstract:Real-life and work-related situations of the 21st century present complex problems that require graduates to possess the skills to solve problems in challenging and unfamiliar arenas. Students must therefore have the skills to deal with a wide range of problems. Unfortunately, most students struggle to apply their learning to novel problem-solving situations regardless of their self-efficacy beliefs. It appears particularly significant to investigate this phenomenon in the context of physics education. Using a mixed-methods design within a collaborative learning environment (CLE), this study investigated the factors that influence students’ self-efficacy in solving conceptual mathematical problems in physics. The primary data sources were the science problem solving questionnaire (SPSQ), the self-efficacy rating scale (SERS), and two semi-structured interview items. The results of multi-level regression and descriptive data analysis revealed students’ self-efficacy in solving conceptual mathematical problems in physics (β=.16, p<.01, SE=.065). Among all the self-efficacy variables (e.g., mastery experience, vicarious experience, physical arousal, anxiety, and gender), mastery experiences composed the largest amount of unique variance between male and female students (36% and 21%). The regression coefficient showed a significant difference between male (β=.13, p<.01, SE=.02) and female (β=.34, p<.01, SE=.07). Female students reported slightly higher levels of anxiety (3%) than male students (2%) when completing the SPSQ. In terms of physiological states, females reported 7% and males 1%. The results also showed a strong positive relationship between the instructional approach and student performance (r=.86, p<.001). One major implication of this study is that science educators could include appropriate instruction in delivering content courses to potentially support student teachers at the beginning of their science education studies.

Investigating Unprompted and Prompted Diagrams Generated by Physics MajorsDuring Problem Solving

To use or no to use diagrams: The effect of drawing a diagram in solving introductory physics problems

Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems

Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part II: An example from waves

Problem-appropriate diagram instruction for improving mathematical word problem solving

Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers

Using Reflection with Peers to Help Students Learn Effective Problem Solving Strategies

Student facility with ratio and proportion: Mapping the reasoning space in introductory physics

Facilitating Problem Solving in a University Undergraduate Physics Classroom: The Case of Students’ Self-Efficacy

What Diagrams Are Considered Useful for Solving Mathematical Word Problems in Japan?

Understanding Spatial Diagram Structure: An Analysis of Hierarchies, Matrices, and Networks

A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Images

Problem-solving a lesson from relativity in physics education

Theoretical exploration of task features that facilitate student sensemaking in physics

Surveying Graduate Students' Attitudes and Approaches to Problem Solving

Drawing to learn: How producing graphical representations enhances scientific thinking.

Blending physical knowledge with mathematical form in physics problem solving

Epistemic Impact on Group Problem Solving for Different Science Majors

Student and AI responses to physics problems examined through the lenses of sensemaking and mechanistic reasoning

Unpacking Symbolic Equations in Introductory Physics

Exploratory diagramming and diagram theory: Greimas, Peirce and Châtelet