Abstract:Research has shown that visual representations can substantially enhance the learning and understanding of STEM concepts; despite this, students tend to struggle in using them fluently and consistently. Consequently, educators advocate for explicit instructions that support the coordination of multiple representations, especially when concepts become more abstract and complex. For recent years, the drawing (or sketching) technique has received increasing attention. Theoretical considerations and prior research suggest that drawing has the potential to support knowledge construction and to provide cognitive relief. In this article, we present two studies that investigate the impact of drawing activities in a multi-representational, instruction-based learning scenario from physics, more precisely, in the context of vector fields. Further, mobile and remote eye tracking was used to record students' gaze behavior in addition to monitoring indicators of performance and cognitive load. Here, eye movements provide information about cognitive processes during the completion of the instruction, on the one hand, and during subsequent problem solving, on the other hand. Comparisons of a treatment group instructed with drawing activities and a control group instructed without drawing activities revealed significant differences in students' perceived cognitive load ( p = 0.02, d = 0.47 and p = 0.0045, d = 0.37), as well as their response accuracy ( p = 0.02, d = 0.51) and their response confidence ( p = 0.02, d = 0.55 and p = 0.004, d = 0.64) during assessment after instruction ( N = 84). Moreover, students instructed with drawing activities were found to distribute more visual attention to important parts of the instruction (vector field diagram and instructional text, N = 32) compared to the control group and, further, showed effective, expert-like behaviors during subsequent problem solving ( N = 53). Finally, as a contribution to current trends in eye-tracking research, the application of mobile and remote eye-tracking in drawing-based learning and assessment scenarios is compared and critically discussed.

Drawing to learn: How producing graphical representations enhances scientific thinking.

Drawing as a versatile cognitive tool

Drawing-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology

Drawing as a means to characterize memory and cognition

The knowledge produced through student drawings

Watching videos of a drawing hand improves students' understanding of the normal probability distribution

Why do learners who draw perform well? Investigating the role of visualization, generation and externalization in learner-generated drawing

Drawing-to-Learn: Does Meta-Analysis Show Differences Between Technology-Based Drawing and Paper-and-Pencil Drawing?

Drawing pictures during learning from scientific text: testing the generative drawing effect and the prognostic drawing effect

Promoting Sketching in Introductory Geoscience Courses: CogSketch Geoscience Worksheets

Analysis of eye movements to study drawing in the context of vector fields

New Thinking on, and with, Data Visualization

Teaching and Learning Data Visualization: Ideas and Assignments

Advancing art–science collaboration through a framework of play: What is the purpose of generating hand-drawn representations of technologically advanced, high-resolution image-data?

Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems

Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment

Visual Thinking in Mathematics

Sketching as an external representation of thinking results and processes in education

A multimodal approach to visual thinking: the scientific sketchnote

Graphical Tools for Conceptualizing Systems Thinking in Chemistry Education