Understanding and Circumventing Failure Mechanisms in Chalcogenide Optical Phase Change Material Ge2Sb2Se4Te

Cosmin Constantin Popescu,Kiumars Aryana,Brian Mills,Tae Woo Lee,Louis Martin‐Monier,Luigi Ranno,Jia Xu Brian Sia,Khoi Phuong Dao,Hyung‐Bin Bae,Vladimir Liberman,Steven A. Vitale,Myungkoo Kang,Kathleen A. Richardson,Carlos A. Ríos Ocampo,Dennis Calahan,Yifei Zhang,William M. Humphreys,Hyun Jung Kim,Tian Gu,Juejun Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202402751
IF: 9
2024-11-30
Advanced Optical Materials
Abstract:Chalcogenide optical PCMs have gathered interest for their potential in compact, non‐volatile optics and photonics. Free‐space PCM metasurfaces require new considerations from phase change memory that need to be addressed for reliable scale‐up. Several failure mechanisms pertaining to free‐space PCM devices and layout methods are isolated to prevent them. Chalcogenide optical phase change materials (PCMs) have garnered significant interest for their growing applications in programmable photonics, optical analog computing, active metasurfaces, and beyond. Limited endurance or cycling lifetime is however increasingly becoming a bottleneck toward their practical deployment for these applications. To address this issue, a systematic study elucidating the cycling failure mechanisms of Ge2Sb2Se4Te (GSST) is performed, a common optical PCM tailored for infrared photonic applications, in an electrothermal switching configuration commensurate with their applications in on‐chip photonic devices. Further a set of design rules building on insights into the failure mechanisms is proposed, and successfully implemented them to boost the endurance of the Ge2Sb2Se4Te (GSST) device to over 67 000 cycles.
materials science, multidisciplinary,optics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?