Abstract:Background: Considering the declining situation of sustainability in global marine fisheries, World Trade Organization (WTO) members successfully concluded the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies(AFS) after 21 years of negotiations in 2022. As an the integral part of these negotiations, special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions provide developing countries with special rights and developed countries with the possibility to treat developing countries more favorably than other WTO members. Objective: This study analyzed the role of SDT for fisheries subsidies in ensuring sustainable fishery governance by the rule of law, as well as the reflection of SDT under the AFS, to explore whether SDT can support sustainable fishery governance under the WTO framework. Methods: This study is primarily based on official data and critical legal studies and used normative analysis and historical analysis to expose the essence of the SDT issue in the AFS as a political game in the legal form. Results: The practical challenges in the implementation of SDT may affect the compliance willingness of member states. To overcome the obstacles, such as ambiguity and inefficiency, that impede the legalization process of sustainable global marine fishery governance, it is necessary to emphasize the value of SDT for the common interests of the WTO members in marine fisheries legislation. This will benefit the developing countries, especially the small island developing states, in the short term; and the common interests of developed and developing countries in the long term. Policy implications: SDT facilitated the consensus between the developing and developed countries on issues such as illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing subsidies and overfishing subsidies. However, current SDT practices have deviated from the original intention of the fairness and democratic approach of global marine fisheries governance, which should take into consideration the specific situation of developing countries.

DSB's Standard of Review on the Safeguarding Measures

On the Review Standard of Administrative Litigation in International Trade

On the Improvement of China’s Antidumping Judicial Review System

The Hierarchy of Remedies under the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Its Impact

The Subject Matter of Judicial Review under WTO System

On Administrative Litigation Of International Trade From Multiple Perspectives

No Country is an Island in Regulating Food Safety:How the WTO Monitors Chinese Food Safety Laws Through the Trade Policy Review Mechanism（TPRM）

The Origin and Formation of Safeguard Measure under WTO Framework

How can the rule of law under the WTO framework ensure sustainable fishery governance through fishery subsidies? A study from the perspective of special and differential treatment

On the Legal Enforceability of WTO S&D Treatment Provisions

Analysis on the New Challenges WTO/SPS Faces

Guarding the Great Wall?—jurisprudential Review of Treaty Interpretative Tools in Chinese BIT-based Arbitration Cases

Protectionism in the Era of Globalisation: The Misuse of Anti-Dumping Instruments From an EU Perspective.

Analysis on the Dispute between China and U.S. over Double Remedies

Go dutch-a proposal to optimise the standards and procedures for judicial review of arbitral awards in china

Principles of Judicial Examination on WTO Agreements and Response to Supervision in Administrative Litigation

Empirical Studies on the Appellate Stage of WTO Dispute Settlement Practices

A Positive Study of Dispute Settlements Involving China Since Its Accession to the WTO

The Impact Analysis of WTO Dispute Resolutions on the Chinese Agricultural Support Policies

Study on the WTO’s Examination on Cases-related China’s Domestic Laws and Response

A Compare Study on Expire Review System of Anti-Dumping Case between China and South Korea