Abstract:The first countervailing duty law dates from the late nineteenth century when the US enacted a law to address sugar subsidies provided by Russia. Canada enacted the first anti-dumping law in 1904, and the US introduced the right to use safeguard measures in the US-Mexico reciprocal trade agreement of 1942. In the late 1940s, these trade remedies were included in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Before 1995, however, their use was mainly limited to developed countries at the forefront of trade liberalization. Before the Uruguay Round, many countries had made only limited tariff bindings and had little need for trade remedies to address import problems. Since the Uruguay Round, which established the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 and required all Members to bind the vast majority of their tariff lines, many more countries have found trade remedies to be a necessary tool to address import problems. Over the first eighteen years of the WTO's existence, the number of users of trade remedies (antidumping, countervailing duty, and safeguard actions) has increased and these measures are now used by both the traditional users of such remedies (e.g., US, EU, Canada, Australia) and by new users (e.g., India, Argentina, Brazil, China, Turkey, Egypt). Some ask whether the use of the internationally negotiated trade remedy tools within the WTO by a wide range of countries (both old and new users) is a cause of concern or a positive sign. In the author's view, the increased use of trade remedies within the WTO is a positive sign for the global trading system, and not a cause for concern. Resort to trade remedies is not a sign of protectionism but an integral part of the trading system which can help Member nations expand their trade liberalization. However, the WTO needs to be concerned about the abuse of trade remedies by WTO Members who appear to have used trade remedies as a form of retaliation against trading partners pursuing their WTO rights.

The Origin and Formation of Safeguard Measure under WTO Framework

The Economics of Safeguards under the WTO: A Case Study of the Steel Industry

Influences on Selection Policies of Agriculture Protection for Entry WTO

On the Market Disruption and the Abuse of the Transitional Product-Specific Safeguard Measures Against China

Origin and Development of Anti-dumping: a Global Perspective

Antidumping: A Study with Respect to Antimonopoly Law

DSB's Standard of Review on the Safeguarding Measures

Protectionism in the Era of Globalisation: The Misuse of Anti-Dumping Instruments From an EU Perspective.

Study on the Recognition of China's Market Economy and the Completion of China's Subsidy System

On the Pneumatic OTR Tires Case from a Multilateral Trade Perspective——And Analyze the Judicial Practice of US Anti-Subsidy Law

Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?

Antidumping duties and price undertakings: A welfare analysis

Research on the Policy Vicissitude and Growth Environment for China's Agricultural Foreign Trade

Temporary trade barriers and enterprise export market changes: evidence from China

Special Safeguard Mechanism for Agriculture: Implications for Developing Members at the World Trade Organization

Support System Model for Exports Anti-dumping Early-Warning

Study on the Relations Between Export Restrictions and the Multilateral Trade System

The Hierarchy of Remedies under the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Its Impact

The Determination of “Basic Security Interests” in the WTO Security Exception Clause

From ‘Non-Market Economy’ to ‘Significant Market Distortions’: Rethinking the EU anti-Dumping Regulation and China’s State Interventionism

The price effect of China tire safeguard