Abstract:The first countervailing duty law dates from the late nineteenth century when the US enacted a law to address sugar subsidies provided by Russia. Canada enacted the first anti-dumping law in 1904, and the US introduced the right to use safeguard measures in the US-Mexico reciprocal trade agreement of 1942. In the late 1940s, these trade remedies were included in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Before 1995, however, their use was mainly limited to developed countries at the forefront of trade liberalization. Before the Uruguay Round, many countries had made only limited tariff bindings and had little need for trade remedies to address import problems. Since the Uruguay Round, which established the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 and required all Members to bind the vast majority of their tariff lines, many more countries have found trade remedies to be a necessary tool to address import problems. Over the first eighteen years of the WTO's existence, the number of users of trade remedies (antidumping, countervailing duty, and safeguard actions) has increased and these measures are now used by both the traditional users of such remedies (e.g., US, EU, Canada, Australia) and by new users (e.g., India, Argentina, Brazil, China, Turkey, Egypt). Some ask whether the use of the internationally negotiated trade remedy tools within the WTO by a wide range of countries (both old and new users) is a cause of concern or a positive sign. In the author's view, the increased use of trade remedies within the WTO is a positive sign for the global trading system, and not a cause for concern. Resort to trade remedies is not a sign of protectionism but an integral part of the trading system which can help Member nations expand their trade liberalization. However, the WTO needs to be concerned about the abuse of trade remedies by WTO Members who appear to have used trade remedies as a form of retaliation against trading partners pursuing their WTO rights.

On the Market Disruption and the Abuse of the Transitional Product-Specific Safeguard Measures Against China

China's Intra-product Trade: Status Quo Problems and Countermeasures

On the Trade Dispute Derived from the Hidden Trouble of the Security of GMOs and the Countermeasures of China

Main Contents and Problems of the U.S. “Chip Act” and China’s Response in the Context of WTO

On the Trade Protectionism and the Countermeasure of China

Recarding the issue of the competitiveness of Chinese agriculture after the accession to WTO | Zur Frage der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Landwirtschaft Chinas nach dem WTO-Beitritt

Chinese agriculture after the WTO accession: Competitiveness and policy

The Influence of China's Export Trade on Technical Barriers to Trade and the Countermeasures

Three Changes Not Foreseen by WTO Rules Framers Twenty-Five Years Ago

Product Adjustments of Multi-Product Exporters: Evidence from Us-China Trade War

Analysis of the Causes and Countermeasures of the Escalation of Sino-US Trade Friction

The Legal Analysis on GATT Article 20 Invoked in China's Export Restriction Measures on Various Raw Materials

Research on the Policy Vicissitude and Growth Environment for China's Agricultural Foreign Trade

On Examination of Domestic Laws in the WTO Dispute of Settlement

From ‘Non-Market Economy’ to ‘Significant Market Distortions’: Rethinking the EU anti-Dumping Regulation and China’s State Interventionism

RETRACTED: Chinese labor-intensive industries under trade protectionism – Characteristics, comprehensive strategies and educational revelations based on economic comparative advantage

Trade and Morality:A Legal Analysis of Sino-US Disputes on Cultural Products

Analysis on the Causes and Countermeasures of Sino-US Trade Friction

The Origin and Formation of Safeguard Measure under WTO Framework

Terroir and Trade War: Reforming China’s Legislation on Generic Terms Under the nfluence of the EU and US

Trade Remedy Actions by WTO Members: A Cause for Concern or a Reflection of Improved Market Access?