Abstract:Three major concerns drove the U.S. into initiating the trade war, and they are (a) the concern that China’s chronically large trade surplus was depressing job creation in the U.S. (b) the concern that China was using illegal and unfair methods to acquire U.S. technology at an effectively discounted price; and (c) the concern that China seeks to weaken U.S. national security and its international standing. On the dispute over China’s exchange rate and trade imbalance, the first conclusion is that it was marked by analytical confusion over the meaning of the term ‘equilibrium exchange rate’. The second conclusion is that China’s trade imbalance reflects the economic conditions in both China and U.S., and that the efficient and fair solution of the problem requires policy changes in both countries. On the industrial policy dispute, the first conclusion is that the issue of forced technology transfer is largely a dispute about China using its market power to benefit itself at the expense of its trade partners. The second conclusion is that China’s use of market power can last only until the other large countries could unite and retaliate as a group. The inevitability of retaliation means that China should replace the joint-venture (JV) mechanism for technological diffusion with other ways to strengthen its technological capability. On the U.S. concern about whether China trade weakens its national security, the first conclusion is that the notion of national security that is commonly adopted in the U.S. trade policy debate is ignorant about the primary determinants of U.S. capability in innovation. By focusing instead mainly on how to hold down China technologically, the long-run outcome will be a technologically weaker U.S. and hence, a more vulnerable U.S. The second conclusion is that the U.S. must identify a clear, short list of critical technologies and critical infrastructure for the recently reformed Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to cover, and update this list constantly. Otherwise, the broad and changing nature of notions about national security would allow the bureaucratically driven phenomenon of mission-creep to steadily expand the coverage of the CFIUS process, thereby steadily rendering CFIUS to be operationally capricious. Our principal policy suggestion to China is that, because China’s economy in 2018 is very different from that in 1978 (e.g. many parts of China now look like Singapore and China is Africa’s biggest donor), there should be more reciprocity in China’s trade and investment relations with the advanced economies despite China’s status as a developing economy under WTO rules. Our principal policy suggestion to President Trump is to stop equating strategic competition with economic competition. Strategic competition is normally a zero-sum game. While fair economic competition is usually a zero-sum game in the short run, it generally creates a win-win outcome in the long run.

Three Changes Not Foreseen by WTO Rules Framers Twenty-Five Years Ago

The Politics and Economics of the US-China Trade War

Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War

Technology Transfer under China’s Foreign Investment Regime: Does the WTO Provide a Solution?

Developments in US Trade Policy Amid the Shifting Dynamics of World Trade

On the Market Disruption and the Abuse of the Transitional Product-Specific Safeguard Measures Against China

Mapping Export Control Extraterritoriality in the US-China Technology Decoupling

A skeletal review of the Sino-U.S. “trade war”: contentious issues, trade multilateralism and policy recommendations

United States-China Technological Rivalry

U.S.-China Technological Rivalry: from “Arrogance” to Boycott

The US-China Trade War: Costs, Causes, and Potential Responses by Tier II Powers

Analysis of the Causes and Countermeasures of the Escalation of Sino-US Trade Friction

China's Legal Strategy to Cope with U.S. Export Controls under the WTO Framework

Towards Economic Decoupling? Mapping Chinese Discourse on the China–US Trade War

WTO Reform on State-Owned Enterprise Disciplines and Implications for Korea

Openness, Distributive Conflict, and Social Insurance: The Social and Political Implications of China's WTO Membership

Promising Trail or Perilous Trap? Engaging China in the WTO and Beyond

Building A Market Economy Through Wto-Inspired Reform Of State-Owned Enterprises In China

Searching for a new institutional structure for the global trade system: What role for Asia in the age of US-China competition?

Introducing the Open Clause to Improve Copyright Flexibility in Cyberspace? Analysis and Commentary on the Proposed "Two-Step Test" in the Third Amendment to the Copyright Law of the PRC, in Comparison with the EU and the US.

Critically Rethinking the Law of WTO:Its 20 Years and Future：With Comments on “The Law of WTO Is the Model of International Law”