Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Experimentation at the WTO Lab: Towards a Better ‘interface’ to Accommodate State-owned Enterprises

ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME? CARVING AN INCLUSIVE PATH TOWARDS GLOBAL REGULATION OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES

Building A Market Economy Through Wto-Inspired Reform Of State-Owned Enterprises In China

Institutional Rebound: Why Reforming China's State-Owned Enterprises is So Difficult

Rethinking the (CP)TPP As A Model for Regulation of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

China’s State-owned Enterprises: Instruments of Its Foreign Strategy?

The Theoretical System of Government Regulation with Chinese Characteristics: Demand Analysis, Constructing Orientations and Overall Framework

Can State Owned Enterprises Restructure ? Theory and Evidence from China ( Preliminary , Comments welcome )

State-owned enterprises in the contemporary global business scenario: introduction

The Historic Position、Function and Further Reform of SOE

Reining in the Behemoths for the Common Good? An Analysis of State Control of State-Owned Enterprises and the Pathway to Better Governance in China

Sino-US trade war, the principle of competitive neutrality and the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

Reforming the Chinese State Sector: Mixed Ownership Reforms and State-Business Relations

Three Changes Not Foreseen by WTO Rules Framers Twenty-Five Years Ago

Chinese women after the accession to the world trade organization: A legal perspective on women's labor rights

How Institutions Rebound: Untangling Difficult Reforms in China’s State-Owned Enterprises

Promising Trail or Perilous Trap? Engaging China in the WTO and Beyond

Reform of State-owned Enterprises in China: The Chinese Communist Party Strikes Back

Navigating Global Economic Dynamics: Institutional Innovation and Rule of Law in China's Pilot Free Trade Zones

Challenge and Countermeasure Facing State-owned Foreign Trade Enterprises Confronting WTO