Abstract:With the rise of unilateral protectionism and the blockage of World Trade Organization (WTO) multilateral trading system reform, the United States (U.S.) provides huge financial support to its semiconductor industry through the “Chip Act.” Besides, the U.S. attempts to improve the competitiveness of its semiconductor industry and dominate the international semiconductor market by setting up a series of “guardrails provisions” to curb the development of “foreign countries of concern,” such as China. Through documentary analysis, the main contents of the “Chip Act” are clarified, and its justiciability and compliance are analyzed from the perspective of WTO rules. In terms of actionability, the “Chip Act” meets the general conditions of subsidies and possesses the traits of specificity but at the same time causes damage to other countries’ industries, thus constituting an actionable subsidy. In terms of compliance, the discriminatory provisions of the “Chip Act” violate the principle of non-discrimination. Accordingly, China should actively respond under the WTO framework by promoting the resolution of the Appellate Body crisis and the reform of the dispute settlement mechanism as well as participating in subsidy reform negotiations and contributing Chinese solutions; China should also take the initiative to apply countervailing rules to the “Chip Act” while improving its own trade remedy system.

Analysis on the Dispute between China and U.S. over Double Remedies

The Impact Analysis of WTO Dispute Resolutions on the Chinese Agricultural Support Policies

The Trade Effects of US Anti‐dumping Actions Against China Post‐WTO Entry

The Legal Analysis on GATT Article 20 Invoked in China's Export Restriction Measures on Various Raw Materials

Antidumping duties and price undertakings: A welfare analysis

Retaliatory Anti-dumping and USITC Anti-dumping Determination

New Analysis on Legal Issues of Anti-dumping and Countervailing Launched by the US to Chinese Products under the Financial Crisis

On the Improvement of China’s Antidumping Judicial Review System

On Examination of Domestic Laws in the WTO Dispute of Settlement

A Compare Study on Expire Review System of Anti-Dumping Case between China and South Korea

Analysis on the Injury to Industry by the Dumping and Antidumping Behavior for Agricultural Products in China

The Reality of China's Subsidy and Legal Approaches to Deal with Foreign Countervailing Measures

Main Contents and Problems of the U.S. “Chip Act” and China’s Response in the Context of WTO

The Issue of Non-market Economy Status in China’s Anti-dumping Investigations Against Imports: A Development for the Implementation of New Rules or A Balancing Strategy?

China and WTO Dispute Settlement:Backward to 2011 and Forward for 2012

The Hierarchy of Remedies under the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Its Impact

The Sino-Foreign Battle for Natural Resources and Countermeasures of China in the WTO: From the Perspective of the Burden of Proof

From ‘Non-Market Economy’ to ‘Significant Market Distortions’: Rethinking the EU anti-Dumping Regulation and China’s State Interventionism

'Two roads diverged in [soft]wood' - Targeted Dumping, Differential Pricing Methodology, and Zeroing: US-Canada Anti-dumping in Softwood Lumber

Legal Issues on the Alleged RMB Currency Subsidy in the Countervailing Case against Chinese Export Goods in the U.S.——Comment on the Case in which the American Company Nucor Challenges the U.S. Department of Commerce's Decision not to Investigate an Alle

Arbitration of Reasonable Period of Time under the WTO Dispute Settlement——Suggestions for Implementation of Sino-US IP Dispute Settlement