Abstract:The Administrative Litigation Law of China 1989 paints a rosy picture in which the individual and the government face each other in court, both submitting to the judgment of the law. However, in reality, many administrative cases do not conclude with judicial rulings but largely with withdrawals by plaintiffs (varying between 30-57%). In recent years, coordination and settlement in administrative litigations are even advocated in the official directives.This paper employs national statistical data, articles and reports written by judges to demonstrate that in most situations, withdrawals in administrative cases have not only denied individual plaintiffs the opportunity to protect their legal rights through litigation, but also rendered illusory any potential contribution that litigations might have towards the rule of law. The large number of withdrawals indicates the degree of difficulty that the institution of administrative litigation faces. Efforts made by the Supreme People's Court to enhance the number of administrative cases or reduce the rate of withdrawal have failed to reverse the general pattern. The preference for coordination and settlement that courts at all levels have expressed in administrative litigation may be partly motivated by the prevailing judicial philosophy, but it is believed to be primarily a collective compromise that courts have made in face of challenging conditions.The paper indicates that the institution of administrative litigation, embedded in the contemporary political and social structure of China, cannot be a means for achieving constitutional governance in China, and its impact on social change is severely limited. To eliminate the obstacles to administrative litigation, the immediate priority should be the promotion of judicial independence and authority. In the long term, the reform depends on the growth of civil society and the perfection of democratic politics.

On Administrative Litigation Of International Trade From Multiple Perspectives

Administrative Litigation over International Trade Disputes in the Context of Mix of Laws

On the Review Standard of Administrative Litigation in International Trade

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Principles of Judicial Examination on WTO Agreements and Response to Supervision in Administrative Litigation

On the Improvement of China’s Antidumping Judicial Review System

On Examination of Domestic Laws in the WTO Dispute of Settlement

International Civil Litigation in China: A Practical Analysis of the Chinese Judicial System

Understanding China'S Recent Active Moves on Wto Litigation: Rising Legalism And/Or Reluctant Response?

Study on the WTO’s Examination on Cases-related China’s Domestic Laws and Response

China’s Antitrust Administrative Litigations: Problems and Solutions

On Enlargement of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Actions

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

China'S Experience in Dealing with Wto Dispute Settlement: A Chinese Perspective

China’s Path to the Center Stage of WTO Dispute Settlement: Challenges and Responses

Theoretical Examination and Systematic Reconstruction on Mediation of Administrative Litigation in China

A Positive Study of Dispute Settlements Involving China Since Its Accession to the WTO

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

The Impact Analysis of WTO Dispute Resolutions on the Chinese Agricultural Support Policies

Private International Law in Chinese Courts

Critically Rethinking the Law of WTO:Its 20 Years and Future：With Comments on “The Law of WTO Is the Model of International Law”