Protocol for determining porosity and mechanical properties of ZrO2 obtained throug 3D-printing
D. Huerta
2019-07-04
Abstract:New technologies, such as robocasting, arrive in the 20thcentury fordoing the competence to traditional manufacturing techniques. These techniquesenablethe possibility to produce more versatile ceramic pieces,where biomedical implants are the best example. In this Master’s thesis, Zirconia is going to be investigated due to its high biocompatibility and proper mechanical properties. ZrO2presents a toughening mechanism (i.e. phase transformation in the crack tip accompanied with a volume grain expansion) which increases the resistance of the material to crack propagation. Nevertheless, ZrO2presents a low temperature degradation mechanism in which mechanical properties become dropped off in humid environments. In that context, three commercialgradesofZrO2powders (CY3Z-RA, GY3Z-R60and TZ-3YS-E) are going to be examinedin order to compare them.First of all, it will be characterized the powder. To complete this purpose it will be determined the powder particle size through laser diffraction and the linear intercept method. After on, microstructure will be analysed with x-ray diffraction, and specific surface are by means of BET analysis. Finally, the powder density is going to be determined through He pycnometry, and the amount of binder in GY3Z-R60using a thermo-balance. The second step is to characterize the paste that is going to be printed. In that case, a plate-plate rheometer will analyse the rheology parameters. Afterwards, for the printed specimens, the microstructural (e.g., density,porosity,etc.) and micromechanical properties (e.g. hardness, elastic modulus, etc.) will be determined by using advanced characterization techniques, such asfield emission scanning electron microscopyornanoindentation, among others.The results obtainedfor the powdersare in accordance with the data sheet provided by the suppliers. The pastes present a clear Herschel-Bulkleyfluid with a shear thinning behaviour, indispensable for printing ZrO2parts. After that, four pieces are going to be fabricated through the robocasting technique at 100% and 50% filling spacewith the two first aforementioned feedstocks. Finally it will be characterized the porosity and the mechanical properties of them. Regarding porosity, it will be characterized through 2D and 3D imaging, micro-CT and BET/BJH. It is concluded that 3D imaging is the most suitable characterization technique. However, it is not the most efficientway.With regard to mechanical properties, hardness, indentation fracture toughness and Young’smodulus are going to be determined. The results obtained are an averageof 12.5 GPa for hardness, 5.2 MPa m-1/2for indentation fracture toughness and 230 GPa for the elastic modulusfor both materials. These resultsare in accordance with the reported for ZrO2parts obtained through traditional manufacturing techniques. Hence, the robocasting technique is suitable for manufacturingZrO2parts. To sum up, it is concluded that i) the binder facilitates the rheology of paste,ii) the mixing must be optimized,iii)3D-printing must be performed in a humidity chamber to avoid drying of the pasteand using a metallic nozzle,iv) more efficient or new characterization techniques must be investigated in order to ease porosity measurements, and v) the 3D-printed parts fulfilthe mechanical requirements.
Engineering,Materials Science