Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

On How to Carry out the Provisions on Judicial Budget Guaranteed by Judicial Fund

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

Judicial Cost and Judicial Efficiency:The Financial Guarantee for Courts and Incentives to the Judges in China

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

On the Reform and Perfecting of Adjudication Supervision of People's Procuratorate

Chinese Procuratorate's Functions and Power Allocation in Civil Procedure

The Material Foundation of Local Judicature: A Positive Analysis of the Buildings and Office Equipments of the 32 Advanced People's Tribunals

On the Outline of Improving the Civil Procuratorial Supervision System

From Supporting Suit to Commonweal Suit——On the Basis of Necessary Choice of Civil Administrative Procuratorial Right

On the Public Finance and Budget under the Constitutional Government System

The Legal Structure and Practical Dilemma of the Establishment of the "Review System"

A New Perspective of Government Budget Supervision under Public Finance Framework

Jurisprudential Thinking on the Perfection of Civil Procuratorial Power

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

Interpretation of Deepening the Reform of the People’s Supervisor System Solutions--Based on the Promotion of Judicial Democracy and the Strengthening of the External Supervision of Procuratorial Organs

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

A Study on the Joint Mechanism in the Scope of Civil Action and Non-litigation Procedures

On Civil Trial Supervision System of the People's Procuratorate

Promoting Development of Criminal Procedure Law with Guiding Cases——A Discussion from the Perspective of Criminal Litigation Law

How to Improve Procurator's Quality