Financial Law Protection Approach and System Construction of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights — International Comparison and Chinese Experience
Yunxin TU,Yingzhao PAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16696/j.cnki.11-4778/d.2020.02.006
2020-01-01
Abstract:Under Article 2(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, States undertake three pri-mary obligations, namely "obligations of progressive realization,""obligations of non-retrogression" and "obligations to the maximum available resources." In a domestic constitutional setting, it has been firmly established that protection of economic, social and cultural rights is unavoidably linked to all kinds of economic resources, this so-called "resource-dependence dilemma" has posed serious consti-tutional challenges to fulfilling our commitments to human rights. It is therefore not only useful but also necessary to transform the three primary legal obligations under ICESCR into specific and concrete fiscal obligations. This article provides three approaches for a sys-tematic construction of a financial analysis of economic, social and cultural rights protection. First, States should identify all the available revenues in a democratic process. Second, the budget allocation of economic resources per se is a matter of allocative justice, and State legislatures must act in a way that meets the essential requirements of allocative justice. Lastly, States are bound by certain legal principles to deal with reasonable budget expenditure, and this is the primary obligation for the executive. Based on intensive international compar-isons of selected jurisdictions and China's rights realities, this article proposes bifurcated solutions for China's constitutional protection of economic, social and cultural rights both on horizontal and vertical levels regarding its ongoing fiscal reforms.