Court Pays Enforcement Costs? Funding of Enforcement Proceedings in China

Zhixun Cao

2023-01-01

Abstract:Funding a civil procedure is of great importance, and funding of enforcement proceedings concerns socio-economic constitutions in different countries. A balance between the input of public resources of the state and the costs borne by the parties should be accomplished. Rules for litigation costs could serve as the basis for the rules for enforcement costs. Litigation costs paid by a party concerned to the court shall include case-filing fees, application fees and other expenses. The case-filing fee shall be prepaid by the plaintiff. Merely the litigation costs incurred in courts are recoverable from the losing party while attorney fees are not eligible for cost-shifting. In contrast, the enforcement application fee need not to be prepaid, which means that the ordinary operation of enforcement proceedings is promoted and financially supported by the courts. However, the enforcement creditor still ought to pay the fees for judicial identification and assessment in advance which are then recoverable after the successful enforcement proceedings. Since there is no issue of costs prepaying, there is no need to prepare any cost-shifting rule hereby, and the attorney fees are also not recoverable. As the situation in civil proceedings, the allocation of enforcement costs between the state court and the enforcement creditor is related to the efforts of the court during enforcement proceedings. Although the "court pays" principle is prevailing, there are still doubts based on the interests of general tax-payers. Instead, there are recently public enforcement service paid by the creditor and privatized enforcement systems.