Difficulty in Filing a Lawsuit: Thinking on a "Chinese Issue"
Zhang Weiping
2009-01-01
Abstract:This thesis analyzes the long—discussed issue of "difficulty in filing a lawsuit" in the area of civil procedure. This issue does not refer to the situation that the court cannot accept and hear a case due to its inconformity with relevant laws. It mainly refers to the situation that the court, considering some external factors, refuses to accept some cases which conform to the required conditions stipulated in laws, regulations and judicial interpretations. This thesis points out that one main reason of this issue is the judicial policy of our country which overcomes law. The judicial policy represents itself in civil jurisdiction as restriction and negativity. It means that judicial policy always restricts the acceptance of cases which are in line with the suing conditions. The court will restrict the acceptance of some cases, such as cases of illegal fund raising, infringement due to false information disclosed by listed company, bankruptcy disputes, tainted milk tort disputes, indemnification due to natural disaster such as earthquake, as well as cases that involve sensitive social, political and economic issues. The reasons for the restriction include the specialty of rule of law in our real Society, the limited judicial system and judicial capacity under the specified power structure, the limited regulating scope and function of existing law, and pragmatism, relativism and particularism in consciousness and methodology. In the reality of China, such adjustment by judicial policy is relative ly reasonable, for some controversies which concern legal disputes actually involve political and other social factors, which cannot be independently handled and solved by judicial departments. In our country, the influence of adjustment and regulation by law is very limited, and numerous social relations are regulated by administrative and policy—based rules. The status of judicial departments decides that they lack the capability of judging independently. However, the adjustment by judicial policy which overcomes law also bears high cost. It will obviously jeopardize the authority of law, and even sacrifice public's faith and dependence on rule of law. The author believes that in the background of social transformation including the transformation of rule of law, the judicial policy restriction on filing a lawsuit would be limited gradually and finally terminated.