A study of the Securities Investment Funds Law and its amendment

Liu Jianjun

2009-01-01

Abstract:This article examines most of the key principles with respect to China's investment funds legislation as well as the amendments.Here are the conclusions:(i) rather than an unintended result,the current Securities Investment Funds Law is in fact a natural and logical product of the Chinese legislature's initial legislative intent;(ii) it is crucial to understand the differences among the three organizational forms of investment funds-companies,partnerships and unit trusts-and to avoid a narrow understanding that investment funds are all adopting the form of unit trusts;(iii) an investment fund is per se a"collective investment scheme"rather than a simple"pool of capital";(iv) any legislation and supervision should fully take into account the fundamental difference in risks posed by public offering and private placement investment funds respectively;(v) in order to regulate illegal fundraising activities,it is more effective to amend the Securities Law rather than the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vi) the elimination of various policy and regulatory obstacles impairing the development of investment funds should be achieved by improving the relevant legal system,rather than relying solely on amendments to the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vii) tax incentives should be accorded to venture capital funds instead of securities investment funds(which have already received outsized tax holidays);(viii) to promote private equity and venture capital investments,a more realistic approach would be to formulate specific legislation to govern this sort of activities,rather than using uniform legislation to cover all types of funds even though they are of fundamentally different natures;and(ix) even if uniform legislation is eventually called for,the legislature should take into consideration differences between private equity/venture capital fund and security investment fund and formulate laws accordingly.