Abstract:This article examines most of the key principles with respect to China's investment funds legislation as well as the amendments.Here are the conclusions:(i) rather than an unintended result,the current Securities Investment Funds Law is in fact a natural and logical product of the Chinese legislature's initial legislative intent;(ii) it is crucial to understand the differences among the three organizational forms of investment funds-companies,partnerships and unit trusts-and to avoid a narrow understanding that investment funds are all adopting the form of unit trusts;(iii) an investment fund is per se a"collective investment scheme"rather than a simple"pool of capital";(iv) any legislation and supervision should fully take into account the fundamental difference in risks posed by public offering and private placement investment funds respectively;(v) in order to regulate illegal fundraising activities,it is more effective to amend the Securities Law rather than the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vi) the elimination of various policy and regulatory obstacles impairing the development of investment funds should be achieved by improving the relevant legal system,rather than relying solely on amendments to the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vii) tax incentives should be accorded to venture capital funds instead of securities investment funds(which have already received outsized tax holidays);(viii) to promote private equity and venture capital investments,a more realistic approach would be to formulate specific legislation to govern this sort of activities,rather than using uniform legislation to cover all types of funds even though they are of fundamentally different natures;and(ix) even if uniform legislation is eventually called for,the legislature should take into consideration differences between private equity/venture capital fund and security investment fund and formulate laws accordingly.

The Amendment of Law on Funds for Investment in Securities and the Transformation of Ideas of Market Regulation

On the Logical Evolution and Outlook of the Concept of Illegal Fund-Raising

Solutions on the Problems Caused by China's Legal Scope of Securities

On the Standard for Unspecific Objects in Illegal Fund-Raising:A New Explanation from the Perspective of Private Placement

A study of the Securities Investment Funds Law and its amendment

Research on the Development Status, Problems and Countermeasures of China's Securities Investment Fund Market

The Fledgling Securities Fraud Litigation in China

Thinking on the Legislation of Mutual Fund in China

Positive analysis: institutional flaws of the securities market

The Status Quo Of And The Reflections On The Information Disclosure Of Listed Companies In China

The Functions and Operational System of Securities Investor Protection Fund——A Comparative Law Approach to Institution Improvement

Concerns on Evolution of Securities Clearing and Settlement Regulations in China

Legal dilemma faced by privately offered funds

An Analysis of the Equlibrium Regulation Model in China's Securities Market

Test on the law protection of minority investors in China: Perspective of misrepresentation in securities market

Public enforcement in China’s securities markets: is it a “law matter”?

American Regulations on Private Equity Fund:Development and Reflections

Legal Issues on Private Equity Investment Funds in China

On Logical Justification and Basic Structure of the Basic Law of Public Enterprise

The Protection of Investors and the Regulation on Security Issue

On Implementing QFII System in Chinese Security Market