Abstract:This article examines most of the key principles with respect to China's investment funds legislation as well as the amendments.Here are the conclusions:(i) rather than an unintended result,the current Securities Investment Funds Law is in fact a natural and logical product of the Chinese legislature's initial legislative intent;(ii) it is crucial to understand the differences among the three organizational forms of investment funds-companies,partnerships and unit trusts-and to avoid a narrow understanding that investment funds are all adopting the form of unit trusts;(iii) an investment fund is per se a"collective investment scheme"rather than a simple"pool of capital";(iv) any legislation and supervision should fully take into account the fundamental difference in risks posed by public offering and private placement investment funds respectively;(v) in order to regulate illegal fundraising activities,it is more effective to amend the Securities Law rather than the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vi) the elimination of various policy and regulatory obstacles impairing the development of investment funds should be achieved by improving the relevant legal system,rather than relying solely on amendments to the Securities Investment Funds Law;(vii) tax incentives should be accorded to venture capital funds instead of securities investment funds(which have already received outsized tax holidays);(viii) to promote private equity and venture capital investments,a more realistic approach would be to formulate specific legislation to govern this sort of activities,rather than using uniform legislation to cover all types of funds even though they are of fundamentally different natures;and(ix) even if uniform legislation is eventually called for,the legislature should take into consideration differences between private equity/venture capital fund and security investment fund and formulate laws accordingly.

A Legal Framework of Foreign Securities Investment

Solutions on the Problems Caused by China's Legal Scope of Securities

Are Foreign Institutions More or Less Informed? Evidence from China's Stock Markets

A study of the Securities Investment Funds Law and its amendment

Protection of Foreign Investment in China: The Foreign Investment Law and the Changing Landscape

A study on the defect and improvement in China′s legal regulation of QFII

Analysis of Regulation Question of Our Country's Security Investment Funds

The Rules and Development of Law Application for Transnational Security Investment

The Management of Foreign Private Equity Funds Involves Foreign Investment and Foreign Exchange in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone

The Historical Development of International Investment Law System and Security Investment Regulation——From the Perspectives of Chinese Security Open Market

The Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors:Are They Investors or Speculators?

China’s regulatory framework for outward foreign direct investment

Foreign investment, corporate governance and performance in the Chinese listed A Share companies

On Implementing QFII System in Chinese Security Market

Impacts of the Stock Market Liberalization in China: Evidence from the Foreign Institutional Investor Scheme

Funding Supervision under the System of Authorized Capital

Changing Mechanism of the National Security Review for Foreign Investment – A Perspective from the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act

Legal Reflection on Risk Management of Shanghai's Security Market

Economic Security and Review of M&A by Foreign Capitals

China's Foreign Investment Legal Regime: Progress and Limitations by Yuwen LI and Cheng BIAN. Oxford, United Kingdom/New York, United States: Routledge, 2022. xiv + 207 pp. Hardcover: £130.00; eBook: £27.29. doi: 10.4324/9781003168805

Fdi in China and the Role of Law: an Empirical Approach