Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

The Boundary of Prosecutorial Supervision on Administrative Illegal Behavior

On Coping Mechanisms of Procuratorate for the Public Opinion-Related Cases

On the Reform and Perfecting of Adjudication Supervision of People's Procuratorate

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Chinese Procuratorate's Functions and Power Allocation in Civil Procedure

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Challenging the People Supervisors System

On the Outline of Improving the Civil Procuratorial Supervision System

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Something Lost, Something Gained: Changes in China’s Procuratorate in Response to the Reform of the National Supervision System

Research on the Optimization of Administrative Regulations Supervision and Operation—from the Perspective of Supervision and Supervision Cooperation

Several Ideas concerning the Reform of the Supervision of Legal Proceedings

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws

Jurisprudential Thinking on the Perfection of Civil Procuratorial Power

Legal Control on Administrative Investigation

The Research on Supervision Mechanism of Corruption Crimes Investigation

On the Legalization of the Administrative Accountability in Drug Supervision

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE MECHANISM OF INFORMATION SHARING BY CONSTRUCTING ONLINE CONNECTION BETWEEN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE——a perspective of the legal supervision of procuratorial organ