Comparisonstudies on flow measurement methods for cylinder water hole in diesel engine

LIU Zhentao,SUN Zhaohui,SUN Zheng,HUANG Rui,YU Xiaoli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2016.05.040
2016-01-01
Abstract:Several comparative studies on flow measurement methods for Diesel cylinder water hole were finished. An accuracy comparison test benchandaflow field effect comparison test benchwereestablished.To verify the results, real machine measurementexperiments and the comparison between simulation and experiment were carried out.The results show that the electromagnetic method and turbine method haverelatively low average error through the whole flow range;the errors of all methods becomegreaterwhen flow & caliber decrease, especially for electromagnetic method and pore-plate method whoserelativeerror even exceed 5%.The flow field effects of all methods becomegreaterwhenthe flow increases(approximately followedby linear of index); the effects of electromagnetic method & turbine methodare smallerthan others.The maximum flow measurement relative error was lower than 2.5% and the average relative erroris lower than 1.5%. The pressure loss range and variation tendencyare basically consistent with simulation tests. Comparative resultsare proved to be effective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?