Dosimetry Comparison of IMRT with 3D-CRT and Simple IMRT for Breast Cancer after Radical Surgery

Chang-li RUAN,Qi-bin SONG,Qin-yong HU,Jing-guo FU,Jun ZAHNG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2016.11.033
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the dosimetric distribution of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) together with 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT) and simple IMRT for breast cancer after radical surgery in order to provide the basis for breast cancer radio therapy. Methods Altogether 20 breast cancer patients were collected. For each patient, the combination of IMRT and CRT as well as simple IMRT were designed with the prescription dose of 50 Gy /25 times so as to compare the dosimetric differences in Planning Target Volume (PTV) and Organs at Risk (OAR) of two plans. Results The PTV V95% of two plans were similar [(99.18±0.32)% and (99.43±0.47)% respectively] without statistically significant difference (P>0.05); V105% and V110% of IMRT together with 3D-CRT and simple IMRT were similar without statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Conformity Index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (HI) of combined plans were superior than those of simple IMRT, (P<0.05). In contrast with simple IMRT, ipsilateral lung V30, V20, V5 of combined plans were reduced by 2.68%, 3.25% and 27.38% respectively (P<0.05); cardiac V30, V40 and V50 were reduced by 3.18%, 2.27% and 1.52% respectively (P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with simple IMRT, combination of IMRT and 3D-CRT achieved better effects in dose distribution and CI and reduced the irradiation dose of lung, heart and other vital organs, which showed better application effects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?