Abstract:BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE:Breast-conserving therapy has become a widely accepted treatment option in the management of early-stage breast cancer. Postoperative radiotherapy is conventionally delivered with conventional wedged tangential fields. However, intensity modulation in radiotherapy helps to maximize tumor control while minimizing damage to normal tissues. This study was to evaluate the potential dosimetric benefits and optimal indications of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the intact breast.METHODS:Ten patients with stage Tis-2N0M0 breast cancer, who received breast-conserving surgery, were selected for this study. A dosimetric comparison of forward planning IMRT with conventional wedged tangential technique was performed on each patient using three-dimensional treatment planning. The total prescribed dose for both plans was 5000 cGy/25 fractions. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were used to compare the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risks (OARs) such as ipsilateral lung, contralateral breast, contralateral lung for all patients, and coronary arteries, heart for left sided patients, and liver for right sided patients.RESULTS:The PTV coverage in IMRT plan was similar to that of the conventional plan (97.7% vs. 98.3%). A better dose uniformity throughout the whole breast was achieved by IMRT plan. The percentage of PTV receiving less than 95% prescribed dose and more than 103% prescribed dose (inhomogeneity index, IHI) decreased from 29.9% to 2.9%; the percentage of PTV receiving more than 105% prescribed dose (V105%) decreased from 28.2% to 0.6%. A better amelioration of IHI and reduction of V105% in IMRT plans were observed in the relatively large PTV subgroup. Obvious reduction in the doses to OARs was achieved by IMRT plan. The maximum dose (D(max)) of coronary artery decreased from 5057.1 cGy to 4832.9 cGy, and the mean dose (D(mean)) of heart decreased from 629.8 cGy to 450.7 cGy; the Dmean of liver decreased from 283.9 cGy to 172.0 cGy for right sided patients; the Dmean and percentage of volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V20) of ipsilateral lung decreased from 925.2 cGy to 765.9 cGy, and from 16.0% to 15.3%, respectively; the Dmean and V20 of different central lung distance (CLD) subgroups decreased by 14.7% and 20.9%, 7.0% and 12.9%, respectively; the Dmean of contralateral breast decreased from 75.4 cGy to 20.3 cGy; the Dmean of contralateral lung decreased from 30.9 cGy to 16.1 cGy.CONCLUSION:Forward planning IMRT based on a standard tangential beam arrangement significantly improves the dose homogeneity throughout the target volume of intact breast, and reduces the dose to OARs, especially in patients with large breast volumes or exceeded CLD, who might be proposed as candidates of IMRT for intact breast.

Comparison of dosimetry between inversely optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy and threedimensional conformal radiotherapy using the field-in-field after breast-conserving surgery

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

Comparison between the two techniques for whole breast irradiation with tumor bed boost after breast-conserving surgery

Dosimetric comparison of cardiac and pulmonary dose-volume between two radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery in breast cancer

SU-E-T-17: A Comparison of Forward and Field in Field Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy Planning for Breast Cancer

Dosimetry Comparison of IMRT with 3D-CRT and Simple IMRT for Breast Cancer after Radical Surgery

Dosimetric comparison of three different radiotherapy techniques in whole breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for left breast cancer

Comparison and Analysis of Dosimetry in Three Kind of Plan of Whole Breast Radiation Therapy after Breast-Conservation Treatment in Breast Cancer

Comparison of Six Irradiation Techniques for Delivering Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost after Breast-Conserving Surgery

Dosimetric study of tangential and multi-fields applied in the dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery

Dosimetric comparison of left-sided whole breast irradiation with 3D-CRT, IP-IMRT and hybrid IMRT.

Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Radiotherapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Photon-Based Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Dosimetry study in Hybridintensity modulated radiotherapy after breast cancer surgery

[Dosimetric Evaluation of Intensity-Modulated Tangential Beam Versus Conventional Tangential Irradiation for Breast Cancer].

[Dosimetric Comparison of Left-Side Whole Breast Irradiation with IMRT and Hybrid IMRT].

Dosimetric Comparison Between Three Radiotherapy Regimens Involving Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Regions in Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Surgery

A Comparison of Doses for Conventional Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy after Breast-Conserving Operation

Comparison of clinical efficacy between simultaneous integrated boostintensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) and late-course boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (LB-IMRT) for early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Tangential Beam for Breast Cancer

Dosimetric Comparison of Incidental Radiation to the Internal Mammary Nodes after Breast-Conserving Surgery Using 3 Techniques-Inverse Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Field-in-field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, and 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy

A Comparative Dosimetric Study of Left Sided Breast Cancer after Breast-Conserving Surgery Treated with VMAT and IMRT