Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography or angioplasty

周景昱,吕安林,贾国良,郭文怡,王琼,王小燕,李援,李伟,赵月盛

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2003.02.006

2003-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the practical clinical applicability and safety of coronary interventions performed through the radial artery. Methods 608 patients with coronary heart disease undergoing angiography or angioplasty were prospectively randomized to have their procedure performed from either the radial (274, group A) or femoral (334, group F) access site and the results compared. Exclusion criteria for transradial approach were the absence of radial pulse and abnormal Allen′s test. Results In three patients radial puncture was not successful (1.09%), and brachial artery access was necessary to complete the procedure. In group F, eight patients were not successful (2.40%, P0.05). Minor hematoma occurred in four patients with transradial approach and in 59 with transfemoral approach (1.46% vs 17.78%, P0.01). Major hematoma complications occurred in one patient of group A and 12 patients of group F (0.36% vs 3.59%,P0.05), and two patients required blood transfusion in group F. None of the patients suffered from pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and ischemia of the hand. Conclusion Coronary angioplasty can be performed safely using the transradial approach with relatively few vascular complications and with better patient′s comfort.