The Feasibility and Safety of Percutaneous Transradial Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesion
Xin Xingli,Zhang Jiangang,Geng Tao,Peng Wanzhong,Song Zhiyuan,Ma Zengcai,Xu Zesheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2016.01.008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main coronary artery lesion by transradial approach. Methods A retrospective analysis of 92 cases of interventional treated patients with unprotected left main lesion was performed, including 49 cases by radial artery approach and 43 cases by femoral arterial approach, observing the clinical features, lesion characteristics, equipment selection, the complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in clinical features, complex bifurcation lesions, or surgical success rate between two groups (all P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in stents diameter, length, release pressure or the maximum expansion pressure between two groups (all P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in operation time, exposure time, or dosage of contrast agent between two groups (all P>0.05). In transradial group post operation hospitalization duration was significantly shorter -(2.2±0.4)days vs.(3.3±0.5) days (P<0.01), the rate of local vascular complications was significantly lower 2.0%(1/49) vs. 14.0%(6/43)(P<0.05), comparing with transfemoral group. However, the rate of MACE in 12 months follow-up was similar in two groups 8.2%(4/49) vs.7.0%(3/43)(P=0.83). Conclusions PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery lesion by transradial approach can shorten the duration of hospital stays, reduce the peripheral vascular complications and have good feasibility and safety. Key words: Angioplasty, transluminal, percutaneous coronary; Unprotected left main coronary artery; Prognosis