The beneficial effect of percutaneous coronary intervention via left transradial

Shan JIANG,Yong-ming HUI,Ji ZHANG,Yong-hong XIONG,Qun LI,Jie LI,Ning YU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2011.02.007

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To study the superiority of left transradial approach over the right transradial approach in coronary angiography and angioplasty.Methods A total of 956 patients undergoing coronary angiography and angioplasty were randomized to be performed through left(group A,n=558)or right(group B,n=398)transradial approach.The success rates,causes of procedure failure,the catheter model applied and the catheter placing time were compared between the 2 groups.Results There was no difference in the two groups in the success rates of angiography(91.2% vs 89.4%,P=0.251)and coronary intervention(42.8% vs 49.2%,P=0.066).Failing rates caused by curved subclavian artery or branchiocephalic trunk which hindering catheter passing and placing in group B were higher than that of group A(45.2% vs 24.5%,P=0.037).PCI succeed by primary placing guiding catheter(92.2% vs 74.9%,P=0.0002)or by changing guiding catheter(6.0% vs 18.3%,P=0.0001)were of different success rates between the 2 groups.The rates of shifting to femoral route in group B were higher than in group A(1.8% vs 6.9%,P=0.012).The use of cather Judkins L 3.5(79.2% vs 81.7%,P=0.351)and R 3.5(78.2% vs 80.3%,P=0.445)were similar in the two groups.There was no difference on the puncture-sheild time between the two groups(92.29±20.73 s vs 96.16±21.13 s,P=0.253),but there was a statistic difference between two groups in terms of catheter placing time with shorter time needed in the left transradial approach.Conclusion It is convenient and safe to carry out coronary intervention by left transradial approach compared with right transradial.