The safety and feasibility of 4F catheter in transradial coronary angiography
LIANG Jing,ZHOU Yu-jie,LIU Xiao-li,WANG Zhi-jian,ZHANG Lin-lin,YANG Li-xia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2012.01.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of transradial approach for diagnostic coronary angiography with 4F catheter.Methods From May 2008 to May 2009,947 patients who received transradial coronary angiography in Anzhen hospital were randomized to 4F or 5F catheters.The procedure success rate,image quality,duration of operation,contrast volume,hemostasis duration,percentage of procedures completed with single catheter,catheter knotting,radial artery spasm,and adverse cardiovascular events during and after procedures between the two groups were compared.Diameters of the radial artery were measured with color Doppler ultrasound before,24 hours and 4 weeks after the procedures.Results No significant differences were observed between the 4F and 5F in the procedure success rate,image quality,duration of operation,contrast volume,percentage of procedures completed with single catheter,catheter knotting,radial artery spasm.The hemostasis duration of 4F group was significantly shorter than 5F group(4.62±0.98)h vs.(6.36±0.93) h,P<0.001.No death,acute myocardial infarction or upper limb haematoma occurred in both groups,except 1 ventricular fibrillation in the 5F group.The incidences of radial artery occlusion and intima-media thickening were both significantly lower in 4F group than 5F group(0.60% vs..2.30%,P=0.038;1.10% vs.4.10%,P=0.003).Conclusions Diagnostic transradial coronary angiography with 4F catheter is safe and feasible.Moreover,4F catheter can lead to less radial damage,vascular related complications,hemostasis duration and more comfort.