Comparison of transradial approach and transfemoral approach in coronary angiography

FAN Hua,LAN Yong-qiao,LIN Qi,CHEN Bing-yang,ZHOU Zhen-ke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2011.04.040
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore advantages and disadvantages of transradial approach and transfemoral approach in coronary angiography.Methods A total of 62 cases who would receive coronary angiography in our hospital from January 2009 to June 2010 were randomly divided into two groups,radial group(n=30)and femoral group(n=32).The artery puncture success rate,coronary angiography success rate,operation time,hospitalization time,hospitalization expenses and incidence of post-operation complications were compared and analyzed statistically.Results Radial group has shorter hospitalization time[(5.9±1.3)day],lower hospitalization expenses[(7363.8±1124.9)yuan] and fewer post-operation complications than feromal group and these differences are statistically significant.However,there is no statistically significant difference between two groups in artery puncture success rate,coronary angiography success rate and opration time.Conclusion Compared with transfemoral approach,transradial approach for coronary angiography is safe and effective with fewer vascular complications,no need to lie in bed after operation and shorter hospitalization time leading to lower hospitalization expenses,and therefore is more easily accepted by patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?