Abstract:Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) via the radial artery or via the femoral artery in treating the acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation(STEMI).Methods PCI was performed on 112 consecutive STEMI patients either via the radial artery(n=77) or via the femoral artery(n=35),the correlated index post the procedures,the achievement ratio and the occurrence of the complications were compared between both groups.Results All operations were successfully performed without severe complications in the two groups.There was no significant difference on the number of guiding catheters used in both groups(1.12±0.23 vs 1.08±0.34),the operation time from arteriopuncture to saccule expanding(42.34±1.23 vs 48.18±2.34 min),saccules(1.21±0.32 vs 1.18±0.25) or stents(1.15±0.37 vs 1.16±0.21) applied and contrast agent(98.32±8.51 vs 95.45±7.23ml).However,there were fewer vascular-correlated complications occurred with 8 cases(8/77) of hematoma correlated with arteriopuncture in the radial artery group,in comparison with 13 cases(13/35) in the femoral artery group including 1 case of false aneurysm(P<0.05).There were 5 cases(5/35) of vasovagal reflex occurred in the femoral artery group after the procedure,but no one in the radial artery group(P<0.05).There were fewer urethral catheterizations,i.e.1 case(1/77) in the radial artery group and 6 cases(6/35) in the femoral artery group needed after the procedure.Inpatient time was also reduced(7.45±0.61 vs 8.39±0.53 days,P<0.05)in the radial artery group.In both group,MACE was not found and no revascularization in the target vessel was needed during the follow up for 6 months.Conclusion PCI via femoral artery are both effective and safe in treating STEMI,but PCI via radial artery is correlated with fewer vascular complications,occurrence of vasovagal reflex.

Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Transradial Approach for Coronary Intervention in 92 Cases

[Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with 6F-guiding catheter by transradial approach].

Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in 618 Cases

The efficacy and safety of transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction

Feasibility of Left Radial Artery Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography or angioplasty

The beneficial effect of percutaneous coronary intervention via left transradial

The Clinic Use of Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography and Coronary Stent Implantation

Study on the Safety and Success Rates of Transradial Approach Coronary Intervention

Transradial Compared with Transfemoral Artery Approach of Direct Percutanous Coronary Intervention Immediately after Coronary Angiography

Comparative study of percutaneous coronary intervention via transradial artery and transfemoral artery in the treatment of coronary artery disease

Percutaneous coronary intervention of left transradial approach

Effectiveness and safety of transradial approach for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation

The Clinic Usage of Transradial Approach for Coronary Angiography

Safety and feasibility of transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary catheterization in non-selective patients.

Comparison of Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches for Coronary Angiography

Coronary Interventional Therapy for the Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Through Transradial and Transfemoral Percutaneous

Feasibility of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction

AS-234: Safety and Feasibility of Left Transradial Coronary Intervention in Daily Practice

Success rate and safety of coronary angiography and angioplasty via radial artery approach among a Chinese population.