The Comparison of Three Different Methods of Nerve Localization Applied in Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

张干,袁新平,何绍明,周宁,方凯凯
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4378.2010.01.009
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effects of the interscalene brachial plexus block performed by three different methods of nerve localization-facial pop (FP), paresthesia (PAR), peripheral nerve stimulation (PINS) and the distribution of local anesthet-ics. Methods 90 patients scheduled for upper extremity operations were randomized to three groups (n=30 in each group): group FP, group PAR and group PNS. The extent of sensory and motor blockade of each innervated region was assessed by scale scores,the anesthetic effects of surgical field and the complications were observed and recorded. Computed tomography (CT) was conducted at transections (C_4-T_3) and at sagittal and coronal planes of the interscalene injected with anesthetic (6 cases in each group,randomly). Results There was no significant difference in sensory and motor scale scores of axillary nerve, musculocutaneous nerve,median nerve and musculospiral nerve. The sensory scale scores of cutaneous antebrachii medialis nerve and cubital nerve and the motor scores of cubital nerve were significantly higher in group FP than in group PAR (P
What problem does this paper attempt to address?