Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Extremity Operation

李挺,吴道珠,徐旭仲,黄品同
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-1416.2006.02.010
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effectiveness of supraclavicular brachial plexus block guided by ultrasound with that guided by nerve stimulator or anatomical landmarks. Methods One hundred and twenty ASA Ⅰ-Ⅲ patients (81 male, 39 female) aged 16-62 yrs weighing 40-75 kg scheduled for upper extremity operation under brachial plexus block via supraclavicular approach were randomized into 3 groups ( n = 40 each) : In group U block was guided by ultrasound; in group N nerve stimulator was used to locate the brachial plexus and in group T block was performed in the traditional way based on anatomical landmarks. A mixture of equal volumes of 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lidocaine (0.4 ml·kg-1) was injected in the 3 groups. The onset and intensity of sensory block of musculocutaneous, median, radial and ulnar nerves were measured and analgesia was rated as excellent, effective and failure.Results The rate of satisfactory block of ulnar nerve was significantly lower than that of musculocutaneous and radial nerves in group N and T ( P 0.05) . While in group U there was no significant difference in the intensity of block of the three nerves and the block of ulnar nerve was satisfactory. The rate of satisfactory median nerve block was significantly higher in group U and N than in group T. The onset time of the block of the 4 nerves was longest in group T and shortest in group U ( P 0.01). The effective rate was 100% in group U, 92.5% in group N and 47.5% in group T ( P 0.05) . Excellent block (surgery was accomplished without supplementary drugs) was achieved in 95.5% of the patients in group U; in 70% in group N and 47.5% in group T. Inadvertent arterial puncture occurred in 3 patients. There was no major complication produced by the block in all the 3 groups.Conclusion Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for operations on upper extremity is significantly better than the other two techniques in terms of onset time and success rate of the block.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?