Comparison of ultrasound-guided vs.anatomical landmark-guided axillary brachial plexus block

wang sanyue,chen xinzhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2014.03.049
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effect and safety of ultrasound-guided and anatomical landmark-guided axillary brachial plexus block.Methods Total 68 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery were randomly divided into ultrasound-guided group and anatomical landmark-guided group with 34 cases in each group.The same local anesthetics with1% lidocaine hydrochloride and 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride were performed in both groups.The anesthesia finish,onset of anesthesia,dosage of anesthetics and side effect were analyzed.The anesthetic effect was assessed using visual analogue scale(VAS).T-test and Chi-square test were employed to analyze the results.Results In the ultrasoundguided group,the operating time was(3.11 ± 1.32) min and VAS was(2.86 ± 0.52);in the anatomical landmarkguided group,the operation time was(5.91 ± 2.24) min and VAS was(4.11 ± 0.82) %.The difference in the operation time and the anesthesia effect was statistical significant between two groups(t = 6.282,7.511,P < 0.01).There was one case of Honer syndrome in the ultrasound-guided group,while there were 6 cases of Honer syndrome,3 cases of local anesthetic toxicity reaction,5 cases of hematoma,and 1 case of pneumothorax;the difference in the incidence of honer syndrome and hematoma was statistically significant(χ2= 5.983,5.402,P < 0.05).Conclusion As compared to the anatomical landmark-guided axillary brachial plexus block,ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block can achieve good anesthetic effect,and reduce the adverse reactions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?