Abstract:Objective To compare the image quality of chest low dose CT (LDCT) using automatic exposure control (AEC) and constant current control (CCC) and explore a more reasonable scanning protocol. Methods Two hundred and eighty participants were examined with 64 CT scanner at 7 centers in China. All were divided into 4 groups. Two groups underwent LDCT using AEC with standard deviation set at 25 (A1) and 30 (A2) respectively and the tube current ranged from 10 mA to 80 mA. The other two groups underwent LDCT using CCC with tube current set at 40 mA (C1) and 50 mA (C2) respectively. The axial and MPR images were evaluated by two radiologists who were blinded to the scanning protocols.The radiation dose, noise and the image quality of the 4 groups were compared and analyzed statistically.Differences of radiation dose and noise among groups were determined with variance analysis and t test,image quality with Mann-Whitney test and the consistency of diagnosis with Kappa test. Results There was a significant lower DLP in AEC group than in CCC group [(82.62±40.31)vs ( 110.81±18.21) mGy·cm (F =56. 88 ,P ＜ 0. 01 )], whereas no significant difference was observed between group A2 and group A1 0. 05]. The noisy of AEC group was higher than that of CCC group both on lung window(41.50±9.58 vs 40.86±7.03) and mediastinum window (41.19±7.83 vs 40.92±9.89), but there was no significant difference( Flung =0.835, P=0.476, Fmediastinum =1.910, P=0.128).The quality score of axial image in AEC group was higher than that in CCC group (superior margin of the brachiocephalic vein level: 4.49±0.56 vs4.38±0.64,superior margin of the aortic arch: 4.86±0.23 vs 4.81±0.32,the right superior lobar bronchus Level:4.87±0.27 vs 4. 84 ± 0. 22, the right middle lobar bronchus Level: 4.90±0.25 vs 4.88±0.21) except on the right inferior pulmonary vein level(4. 92 ±0. 25 vs 4. 93 ±0. 17) and superior margin of the left diaphragmatic dome level (4. 91±0.27 vs 4.93±0.22) on lung window, but no significant differences (F=0.076-1.748, P＞0.05) were observed. A significant higher score in AEC group was observed on mediastinum window compared with CCC group on superior margin of brachiocephalic vein level (2.57±0.77 vs 2. 46 ± 0. 59, F = 8. 459, P ＜ 0. 05 ), however, the score of AEC group was lower than that of CCC group on other levels without significant differences (superior margin of the aortic arch:3.36 ±0. 63 vs 3.45 ±0. 60,the right superior lobar bronchus level: 3.94 ±0. 56 vs 3. 95 ±0. 51 ,the right middle lobar bronchus Level: 3.80 ±0. 58 vs 3. 87 ±0. 50,the right inferior pulmonary vein level: 3.72 ±0. 56 vs 3.78 ±0. 53, superior margin of the left diaphragmatic dome level: 3.58 ± 0.63 vs 3.68±0.56,F=0.083-3.380,P ＞ 0.05 ). The MPR image quality of AEC group was better than that of CCC group both on lung window and mediastinum window (Zlung =-2.258, Zmedlastinum=-1.330, P＞0.05). For all participants including the underweighted group, the normal group and the overweighted group, the image quality of A1 group was better than that of A2 group without significant differences (the underweighted group: Zlung=0.000, P=1.000, Zmedastinum= 0.000, P=1.000;the normal group: Zlung =-0.062, P=0.950, Zmediastinum =-0.746, P = 0.456; the overweighted group: Zlung = - 1.177, P = 0.239,Zmediastinum =-1.715, P=0.144) both on lung and mediastinum windows, and for the higher BMI participants, a better image quality was obtained in A1 group than in A2 group on the mediastinum window (Z = -1. 715, P = 0. 144). Conclusions The total radiation exposure dose of AEC group is significantly lower than that of CCC group, but no statistical significant differences are observed between both groups in image quality and noise level. The AEC technique is highly recommended in thoracic LDCT scan for screening program, and the SD25 ( SD value = 25) scan protocol is suggested for higher BMI population while the SD30 (SD value = 30) scan protocol for lower BMI population.

Radiation dose reduction with chest CT using iterative reconstruction technique

Application of Iterative Reconstruction in Upper Limb Intravascular Fistula CT Angiography

Evaluation Of Dose Reduction And Image Quality In Chest Ct Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction With The Same Group Of Patients

Evaluation on impact of iDose~4 on dose reduction and image quality of low dose contrast-enhance chest CT

Karl iterative reconstruction technique for dose reduction in chest examination using 1 6-slice CT:a phantom and patient study

Phantom study of the influence of iterative algorithm on image quality in ultra-low-dose CT scan of lung

Initial Application of Iterative Reconstruction (iDose) in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography with Low-Dose

Reducing the Radiation Dose with the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Chest CT in Adults: a Parameter Study.

Application with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and low radiation in the pulmonary angiography

Evaluation of iterative AIDR and filtered back projection image algorithm on coronary computed tomography angiography

Application of Automatic Tube Current Modulation Combined with Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Low- Dose CT Pulmonary Angiography

Improved Image Quality of Low-Dose CT Combining with Iterative Model Reconstruction Algorithm for Response Assessment in Patients after Treatment of Malignant Tumor

Impact of multiple parameters setting on image quality and radiation dose in low-dose chest CT scanning

Screening for Lung Cancer Using Sub-Millisievert Chest CT with Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: Image Quality and Nodule Detectability.

Pilot Study on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Colonography with Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional

Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan

Initial Application of BMI Adapted and Iterative Reconstruction in Prospective Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography Examination

The Optimization of Low-Dose Scanning Protocols of 64-Slice Spiral CT in the Adult Chest: a Multicenter Study

A Comparison of the Image Quality and Radiation Dose Using 100-kVp Combination of Different Noise Index and 120-kVp in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography.

The clinical application of iterative reconstruction in the head and neck CT angiography

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Coronary Angiography with Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Strong Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional (AIDR3D)