Karl iterative reconstruction technique for dose reduction in chest examination using 1 6-slice CT:a phantom and patient study

彭薇,李琛玮,杨利霞,许永华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2015.04.007
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To assess the value of Karl iterative reconstruction technique (IRT)for dose reduction in chest examination using 16-slice CT.Methods:A CT water phantom was scanned using a 16-slice CT scanner,120kV and different tube current (150,136,123,109,95,83,68,55 and 41mAs).Except the imaging data using 150mAs were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP)method,the other imaging data were reconstructed with Karl IRT.Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)of all images with different parameters were measured and compared.In the clinical study,100 physi-cal examinees were randomly selected into two groups (normal-dose group and low-dose group)and underwent chest CT scanning with two different protocols:for normal-dose group (group A),standard dose (120kV,150mAs)and FBP tech-nique were used;for low-dose group,120kV and 83mAs were used and the imaging data were reconstructed by Karl IRT (group B)or FBP (group C).The image noise,signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),CNR,subjective score of image quality,volume CT dose index (CTDIvol)and effective dose (ED)in the three groups were measured and compared.Results:In the phan-tom study,the images obtained with 95 or 83mAs (60% or 50% standard dose)and Karl IRT showed comparable image noise and CNR with the images using standard dose and FBP method (P>0.05).In the clinical study,the ED [(2.38± 0.26)mSv]in group B and C was 51.1%lower than that [(4.87±0.37)mSv]in group A.There were no significant differ-ences of the image noise,SNR,CNR and subjective score of image quality between group A and B (P<0.05),but the SNR, CNR and subj ective score of image quality of Group B were higher than those of group C with significantly statistic diffe-rence (P<0.05).Conclusion:In chest CT scan,Karl IRT could maintain or improve image quality while saving 51.1%radiation dose,and is superior to FBP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?