A Study of the Application of Iterative Model Reconstruction Combined with Low Tube Voltage MSCT in Renal Artery CT Angiography
dou xin,gong jianping,zhang wei,cai wu,chen guangqiang,zhu jianbing,qiao fang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2017.04.033
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the application of iterative model reconstruction(IMR) combined with low tube voltage MSCT for reducing radiation dose and controlling image quality in renal artery CT angiography(CTA).Methods120 cases of abdominal and pelvic enhancement CT scans were prospectively and continuously collected in our hospital and they were divided into Group A(BMI≤22 kg/m;) and Group B(22 kg/m;< BMI≤25 kg/m;) according to the patient’s BMI.They were then further divided into 3 subordinate groups according to different tube voltages and reconstruction algorithms.The groups were divided as follows: Group A1-FBP((120 k V,FBP; Group A2-iDose;(80 k V,iDose;); Group A2-IMR(80 k V,IMR) and Group B1-FBP((120 k V,FBP); Group B2-iDose;(100 k V,iDose;); Group B2-IMR(100 k V,IMR).We measured each group’s renal artery CT value,graded each group’s renal artery MIP image quality,recorded each group’s CTDIvol,dose length product(DLP),calculated each group’s signal noise ratio(SNR),contrast noise ratio(CNR),iodine consumption amount,figure of merit(FOM) and effective dose(ED).We compared the iodine consumption amount,DLP,ED of A1&A2,B1&B2 with independent-sample t test.We also compared the renal artery CT value,SNR,CNR,FOM of Group A and Group B’s three subordinate groups(A1-FBP,A2-iDose; and A2-IMR; B1-FBP,B2-iDose; and B2-IMR) with one-way analysis of variance.Lastly,we compared the renal artery image quality with rank sum test.Results The CTDIvol,DLP and ED of Group A1 and Group A2 were 16.9m Gy,(886.1 ± 46.0) m Gy · cm,(13.3 ± 0.7) m Sv; 4.9m Gy,(261.9 ± 12.5) m Gy·cm,(3.9 ± 0.2) m Sv respectively.The data mentioned above for Group B1 and Group B2 were 16.9m Gy and(929.6 ± 45.3) m Gy·cm,(14.0 ± 0.7) m Sv; 10.1m Gy、(559.9 ± 26.4)m Gy·cm and(8.4 ± 0.4) m Sv respectively.The difference of the data mentioned above among groups had statistic significance(P < 0.01).The SNR,CNR,FOM and image quality grades of A1-FBP,A2-iDose; and A2-IMR were 10.1 ±3.0,13.2 ± 3.5,(11.0 ± 5.9) mGy;,3.0(2.0,3.0); 14.5 ± 4.1,15.6 ± 3.9,(52.5 ± 26.8) mGy;,3.0(2.0,3.0); 34.9 ± 13.3,44.4 ± 12.2,(339.3 ± 237.8) mGy;,3.0(3.0,4.0) respectively.The data mentioned above for B1-FBP,B2-iDose; and B2-IMR were 9.0 ± 2.4,9.7 ± 2.7,(6.0 ± 3.7) mGy;,3.0(2.0,3.0); 13.3 ± 3.3,14.9 ±2.9,(22.8 ± 9.3) mGy;,3.0(2.0,3.0); 28.4 ± 9.0,38.5 ± 10.3,(157.0 ± 86.9) mGy;,3.0(3.0,4.0) respectively.The image quality grading difference among Group A1-FBP and A2-iDose;,Group B1-FBP and Group B2-iDose; had no statistical significance(P > 0.05),whereas the data difference for the rest groups had statistical significance(P < 0.01).Conclusion Use of IMR can prominently improve the SNR,CNR and image quality compared to iDose;.Considering the patient’s BMI,by applying appropriate low tube voltage(80 k V or 100 k V) combined with IMR,the optimal image can be obtained while reducing the radiation dose.