Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conduct a comparative study of the surface modifications induced by two different lasers on a 2050‐T8 aluminum alloy, with a specific consideration of residual stress and work‐hardening levels. Design/methodology/approach Two lasers have been used for Laser shock peening (LSP) treatment in water‐confined regime: a Continuum Powerlite Plus laser, operating at 0.532 mm with 9 ns laser pulses, and near 1.5mm spot diameters; a new generation Gaia‐R Thales laser delivering 10 J‐10 ns impacts, with 4‐6mm homogeneous laser spots at 1.06 mm. Surface deformation, work‐hardening levels and residual stresses were analyzed for both LSP conditions. Residual stresses were compared with numerical simulations using a 3D finite element (FE) model, starting with the validation of surface deformations induced by a single laser impact. Findings Similar surface deformations and work‐hardening levels, but relatively lower residual stresses were obtained with the new large 4‐6 mm impact configuration. This was attributed to a reduced number of local cyclic loadings (2) compared with the small impact configuration (4). Additionally, more anisotropic stresses were obtained with small impacts. FE simulations using Johnson‐Cook's material' behavior were shown to simulate accurately surface deformations, but to overestimate maximum stress levels. Research limitations/implications This work should provide LSP workers a better understanding of the possible benefits from the different LSP configurations currently co‐existing: using small ( 4‐5 mm). Moreover, experimental results and simulated data had never been presented on 2050‐T8 Al alloy. Originality/value An experimental (and numerical) comparison using two distinct laser sources for LSP, has never been presented before. This preliminary work should help LSP workers to choose adequate sources.

Study on numerical simulation of residual stresses induced by laser shock processing

Numerical modeling of residual stress induced by laser shock processing

Residual Stress Field Induced by Laser Peening: a Finite Element Analysis

Optimization Of Residual Stresses Induced By Multiple Laser Shock Processing

Stepwise varying of laser parameters to enhance the residual stress field in multiple laser shock processing: numerical verification of single-point region

Experimental and numerical investigation on residual stress of 316L SS treated by different laser shock peening parameters

Mitigation of Tensile Residual Stress Induced During Welding with Laser Shock Processing

Numerical Simulation Research on Laser Shock Forming of Thin Metal Sheet

Numerical Simulation Research on Laser Shock Forming

Preliminary Studies on Strain Rate Dependence of Laser Shock Forming

Numerical investigation on spall fracture in a metallic material caused by laser shock peening

Numerical Investigation of Residual Stress Field Induced by Array-Type Laser Shock Peening

Redistribution of Residual Stress Field in the Weld Joint Due to Laser Shock Processing

Residual Stress Distribution and Microstructure at a Laser Spot of AISI 304 Stainless Steel Subjected to Different Laser Shock Peening Impacts

Investigation on surface “residual stress hole” of thin plate subjected to two sided laser shock processing

Investigation of Ductile Damage Induced by Laser Shock Processing on a 35CD4 Steel

A Comprehensive Review on Finite Element Analysis of Laser Shock Peening

Laser shock processing with two different laser sources on 2050‐T8 aluminum alloy

Simulation of Residual Stress and Micro-plastic Deformation Induced by Laser Shock Imprinting on TC4 Titanium Alloy Aero-engine Blade

Unraveling Residual Stress Distribution Characteristics of 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy Induced by Laser Shock Peening

Effects of surface curvature on residual stress field of 316L stainless steel subjected to laser shock peening