Abstract:The development of high-power fuel cells could advance the electrification of the transportation sector, including marine and air transport. Liquid-fueled fuel cells are particularly attractive for such applications as they obviate the issue of fuel transportation and storage. Herein, we report a direct methanol hydrogen peroxide fuel cell (DMHPFC) for high-power propulsion applications that delivers 0.8 W cm 2 peak power density by using a pH gradient-enabled microscale bipolar interface (PMBI) to effectively meet the incongruent pH requirements for methanol oxidation/peroxide reduction reactions. DMHPFCs are an important alternative to hydrogen-fed polymer electrode membrane fuel cell (PEMFCs) and anion exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) due to methanol’s high energy density compared to that of hydrogen and superior kinetics of hydrogen peroxide reduction reaction as compared to Oxygen. A unit volume of Hydrogen gas stored at a pressure of approximately 69 MPa corresponds to volume-specific energy density of roughly 2.1 kWh/l while 39% volume of aqueous methanol and 41% volume of aqueous hydrogen peroxide corresponds to volume-specific energy density of 9.2 kWh/l. So, DMHPFC’s energy density is approximately four times higher than hydrogen fuel cell’s energy density and is comparable to gasoline which contains roughly 9.2 kWh/l of available bond energy. The theoretical potential for Methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) in basic medium is lower than that in an acidic medium (-0.78 V vs. -0.02 V) and the theoretical potential for the Hydrogen peroxide reduction reaction (HPRR) is higher than that for oxygen reduction (1.77 V vs. 1.23 V in acidic medium). This results in the highest theoretically possible cell voltage for cells with alkaline anodes and acidic cathodes. We achieved sustained operation of the DMHPFC with an alkaline anode and an acidic cathode by incorporating our pH-gradient-enabled microscale bipolar interface (PMBI). However, the system exhibits a relatively low Faradaic efficiency of 50% due to the parasitic evolution of O 2 by the decomposition of H 2 O 2 . The O 2 evolution results in a mixed potential at the cathode due to the occurrence of both the HPRR (E 0 = 1.77 V versus standard hydrogen electrode [SHE]) and the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); (E 0 = 1.23 V versus SHE), lowering the overall cell potential. The O 2 surface coverage reduces the available sites for the HPRR, effectively deactivating the catalyst. Electrocatalysts exhibiting a combination of high HPRR activity and selectivity (by inhibiting H 2 O 2 decomposition, and hence inhibiting ORR) would result in higher faradic efficiency and have been the subject of sustained interest. Here, we examine an alternate reactant-transport engineering approach to improve the overall cell potential and cell performance of the DMHPFC. Our reactant-transport engineering approach has examined the impact of reactant flowrate, flow velocity, residence time, and flow regime (via the Reynolds number ([Re]) on DMHPFC performance. Balancing the competing demands of high residence time to improve Hydrogen peroxide reduction reaction (HPRR) rates with high flowrates to detach adsorbed O 2 , we identify a critical Re and Damkholer number (Da) to efficiently exclude O 2 gas bubbles while maintaining large current densities during the operation of a DMHPFC. Reactant-transport engineering of the cathode flow field architecture and fuel flowrates mitigates parasitic hydrogen peroxide decomposition and oxygen reduction reactions and lessens cathode passivation by oxygen bubbles. DMHPCs fulfilling these criteria provide a power density of >500 mW cm -2 at 1.0 V compared to state-of-the-art polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) that typically operate at 0.75 V. The high peak power density of 800 mW cm -2 at 1.1 V may offer a pathway to reduce fuel cell stack size for propulsion applications. Our work paves the way for such other liquid fuel cells with hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant and enabled with PMBI resulting in significantly improvement in the performance. Figure 1

A direct methanol–hydrogen peroxide fuel cell with a Prussian Blue cathode

A Development of Direct Hydrazine/Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Cell

A high-performance direct methanol fuel cell with a polymer fiber membrane and RuO2/CNTs as a cathode catalyst

Dual Oxidation by Hybrid Electrode: Efficiency Enhancement of Direct Hypophosphite Fuel Cell

An alkaline direct methanol fuel cell with a polymer fiber membrane and MnO2-catalyzed cathode

A Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell with a Polymer Fiber Membrane and Non-Noble Metal Catalysts.

A Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Without the Use of a Polymer Electrolyte Membrane or Precious Metal Cathode Catalyst

Reactant Transport Engineering Approach at Cathode to High Power Direct Methanol Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Cell

Performance of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell

A Liquid–Vapor Two-Phase Model of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells With Platinum Group Metal-Free Cathode Catalyst

Direct Hydrazine Borane Fuel Cell Using Non-noble Carbon Supported Polypyrrole Cobalt Hydroxide as Anode Catalyst

Durability of Direct Internal Reforming of Methanol As Fuel for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with Double-Sided Cathodes

Anodic Catalyst Support via Titanium Dioxide-Graphene Aerogel (TiO2-GA) for A Direct Methanol Fuel Cell: Response Surface Approach

Improved Catalysts for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Direct Liquid Fuel Cells by Using Hypophosphites

A Neat Methanol Fed Passive DMFC with a New Anode Structure

Direct methanol oxygen-ion conducting solid oxide fuel cell with an integrated in-situ cracking reactor

A Micro Passive Direct Methanol Fuel Cell with High Performance Via Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation on Aluminum-Based Substrate

Direct peroxide-peroxide fuel cell - Part 2: Effects of conditions on the performance

High-Performance Direct Methanol Fuel Cells with Precious-Metal-Free Cathode.

Preparation and Simulation of an Additional Catalyst Layer for Direct Methanol Fuel Cell