Modeling of solid–liquid coupling and material removal in robotic wet polishing
Jie Pan,Fan Chen,Jin Meng,Huan Zhao,Zhaocheng Dong,Donglin Pu,Peng Ruan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11213-7
IF: 3.563
2023-03-22
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Abstract:In this paper, the flow characteristics of the polishing fluid between the polishing pad and the workpiece are studied for the robotic wet polishing process. The distribution of the polishing fluid radial velocity Ur and the liquid film thickness z at different rotating radii r is revealed. The two-dimensional computational domain consisting of the polishing pad surface, the workpiece wall, and the polishing fluid is established. The particle-liquid two-phase flow simulation is carried out in Fluent. The influence of different rotation rates ω of the polishing pad and different robot swing speeds v2 on the change and distribution of polishing fluid flow rate and temperature is elaborated. For polishing fluids with different average abrasive diameters dp, the position distribution of the abrasive particles in the wet polishing process is simulated; the velocity distribution of particles in the x and y directions impacting on the workpiece surface is analyzed. The three-dimensional calculation domain for wet polishing is established; the workpiece surface erosion is simulated in Fluent. Considering different combinations of polishing fluid properties Ci and polishing kinematics Pi, the material removal rate MRR and standard deviation of material removal σ on the workpiece surface are calculated. Under the same process parameters, the material removal rate test value MRRT and the standard deviation of material removal test value σT are compared with the simulated values, respectively. The results show that under the combination of 64 groups of physical parameters C1-C64 of the polishing fluids, the error between the test value (MRRT, σT) and the simulation value (MRR, σ) is within 5%. With 64 sets of polishing kinematic parameters P1-P64, the average error between the test value MRRT and the simulated value MRR is 4.19%. However, when the polishing pad rotation rate ω is high, there is an inefficient polishing area in the smaller radius from the polishing pad rotation center, which results in a lower MRRT in some tests than that in simulation, with a maximum error of 8.1%. The average error between the test value σT and the simulation value σ is 3.77%. When the pressure P of the polishing pad is high, the large particles embedded in the polishing pad surface follow its rotation, causing deep scratches on the workpiece surface, which results in a larger σT in some tests, with a maximum error of 7.8%. In conclusion, the material removal principle and the influence of different process parameters in the robotic wet polishing process are revealed in this paper through modeling and simulation of the particle-liquid two-phase flow, giving an accurate estimation of the material removal rate of the robotic wet polishing process.
engineering, manufacturing,automation & control systems