Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anatomical retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy(RSN)and standardize the procedure of RSN. Methods The retrospective analysis was performed on 405 consecutive patients underwent anatomical RSN in Our institute from January 2002 to June 2008.There were 232 male and 173 female patients with the average age of(57.2±14.2)years,among whom there were 228 renal cell carcinoma patients accepted RSU,96 and 49 renal pelvic carcinoma and ureteral carcinoma cases accepted retroperitoneoscopic ureteronephrectomy (RSUN) and 32 cases accepted simple RSN due to loss of renal function caused by benign renal discsses.The tadical RSN was performed by dissecting outside Gerota's fascia and in the latent cavities between this fascia and lateral conal fascia in the dorsal side and between this fascia and prerenal fusion fascia in the ventral side,whereas the simple RSN was done inside Gerota's fascia by making direct incision on it and dissecting between this fascia and perirenal adipose tissue.Kidneys and perirenal adipose tissue were completely removed by dissection along several avascular planes around the kidney under the amplified view of laparoscopy. The software SPSS 12.0 was used for the statistical analysis of all data. Results The mean operative time was (132±48)min for radical and simple RSN and (245 ± 62)min for radical RSUN, which included the time for position change and second skin preparation. The medium estimated blood loss was 100 ml(10-2500 ml) and the average drainage volume was 150 ml (0-1152 ml) postoperatively. 15 cases (3. 70%) required blood transfusion with the median volume of 400ml (400-1650 ml). Four cases (0. 99%) were converted to open surgery due to severe adhesion (2 cases), difficult exposure of renal helium (1 case) and severe bleeding (1 case).The mean drainage time was (3. 9±1.8)d, the mean time to first oral intake was (2.7±1.2)d and the mean postoperative hospital stay was (8.6±3. 8)d. Conclusion The anatomical RSN is safe and effective and should be the standard surgical procedure for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Technique of retroperitoneoscopic anatomical radical nephrectomy

Technical Improvements in Open Radical Nephrectomy with Renal Carcinoma

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumor:report of 15 cases

Experience and Value of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery:Report of 35 Cases

Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy (with a Report of 53 Cases)

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Report of 126 cases

Single-port retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal cystectomy

Laparoscopic upper urinary tract anatomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy(Report of 247 Cases)

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: technical improvements and complication prevention

Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

Clinical study on retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy:a report of 54 cases

[Retrospective study of laparoscopic peritoneal radical nephrectomy]

Anatomical Retroperitoneoscopic Nephrectomy——with Clinical Experience of 405 Cases

Retroperitoneoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy in cases with larger tumors (Average Diameter 7 cm):5-year experience

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy(report of 35 Cases)

RetroperitoneaL Laparoscopic radicaL nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothe‐LiaL carcinoma

Application of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Technique in Nephrectomy

Operative experience of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy

Retroperitoneal iaparoscopic partial nephrectomy(report of 23 cases)

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors