Extent of Agreement Between the Body Fluid Model of Sysmex XN-20 and the Manual Microscopy Method

Wei-Hua Huang,Lin-Peng Lu,Kang Wu,Fang-Yu Guo,Jie Guo,Jing-Long Yu,Dao-Yin Zhou,Yi Sun,An-Mei Deng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22101
IF: 3.124
2016-01-01
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Abstract:BackgroundAlthough the correlations concerning cellular component analysis between the Sysmex XN-20 body fluid (BF) model and manual microscopy have been investigated by several studies, the extent of agreement between these two methods has not been investigated. MethodsA total of 90 BF samples were prospectively collected and analyzed using the Sysmex XN-20 BF model and microscopy. The extent of agreement between these two methods was evaluated using the Bland-Altman approach. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-fluorescence (HF) BF cells for malignant diseases. ResultsThe agreements of white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC), and percentages of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes between the Sysmex XN-20 BF model and manual microscopy were imperfect. The areas under the ROC curves for absolute and relative HF cells were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.78) and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48-0.72), respectively. ConclusionDue to the Sysmex XN-20 BF model's imperfect agreement with manual microscopy and its weak diagnostic accuracy for malignant diseases, the current evidence does not support replacing manual microscopy with this model in clinical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?