A-158 Multi-site verification and performance of body fluids in-between Horiba Medical Yumizen h2500 with Sysmex XN-10 automated hematology analyzers and manual microscopy for morphology assessment

M L Hege

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.156

IF: 12.114

2024-10-27

Clinical Chemistry

Abstract:BackgroundThe analysis of body fluids plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of a wide variety of conditions. As standards for method validation and laboratory developed tests evolve, the body fluids analysis is receiving increased attention from both laboratories and regulatory bodies. We present the evaluated result of the validation and clinical performance accuracy of HORIBA Medical Yumizen H2500 analyzers as compared to SYSMEX XN-10 analyzers and to manual slide microscopy examination as a reference method for differential analysis for body fluids samples.MethodsDepending on each laboratory collected procedures, synovial samples were collected with Sodium Heparin or K2EDTA or without anticoagulant and the other samples were collected with K2EDTA or without anticoagulant. As recommended, most (94%) of the synovial fluids were treated with the hyaluronidase. For the comparison of Yumizen H2500 versus XN-10 analyzers, the study was performed in 2 US sites and 1 French site collecting 390 samples totally: 138 serous fluids (Ascites, Pleural, Peritoneal, Pericardial), 169 synovial fluids and 83 CSF fluids. Samples were analyzed as soon as possible after collection (with a limit of 24 hours for serous and synovial fluids and 4 hours for CSF) and within 2 hours between both instruments. For the comparison of Yumizen H2500 versus reference method (manual microscopy), the study was performed in 2 US sites collecting 58 samples: 34 serous fluids (Ascites, Pleural, Peritoneal, Pericardial), 12 synovial fluids and 12 CSF fluids. Two qualified morphology examiners made the manual microscopy analysis and the average of the results of the 2 slide readings was used for the analysis.ResultsConsidering all types of body fluids, the H2500/XN results are very well correlated for BFWBC (0.969), BFRBC (0.999), BFMN% (0.912), BFMN# (0.89), BFPN% (0.912), BFPN# (0.97). Similarly, the statistical analysis per body fluids type shows very good correlation. For serous type, all results are higher than 0.876, for synovial type all results are higher than 0.879 and for cerebrospinal fluids type, all results are higher than 0.788. Among all samples, less than 8 samples (<2%) were out of the 95% interval. The comparison Yumizen H2500 versus manual microscopy, all the correlation results (r2) are very good: 0,9705 for Polynuclear and 0,9742 for Mononuclear. The study demonstrated better results of Yumizen H2500 versus manual microscopy than versus XN-10 for BFPN% (0.9705 versus 0.912) and BFMN% (0.9742 versus 0.912). Among 58 samples, only 4 (6.9%) were out of the 95% interval for BFPN% and BFMN%.ConclusionsThe Yumizen H2500 results for body fluid WBC differentiation (Polynuclear and Mononuclear) are very well correlated with the results from manual slide microscopy evaluation. The comparison of the results analyzed on Yumizen H2500 and on XN does not show any significant difference.

medical laboratory technology