Abstract:BackgroundThe analysis of body fluids plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of a wide variety of conditions. As standards for method validation and laboratory developed tests evolve, the body fluids analysis is receiving increased attention from both laboratories and regulatory bodies. We present the evaluated result of the validation and clinical performance accuracy of HORIBA Medical Yumizen H2500 analyzers as compared to SYSMEX XN-10 analyzers and to manual slide microscopy examination as a reference method for differential analysis for body fluids samples.MethodsDepending on each laboratory collected procedures, synovial samples were collected with Sodium Heparin or K2EDTA or without anticoagulant and the other samples were collected with K2EDTA or without anticoagulant. As recommended, most (94%) of the synovial fluids were treated with the hyaluronidase. For the comparison of Yumizen H2500 versus XN-10 analyzers, the study was performed in 2 US sites and 1 French site collecting 390 samples totally: 138 serous fluids (Ascites, Pleural, Peritoneal, Pericardial), 169 synovial fluids and 83 CSF fluids. Samples were analyzed as soon as possible after collection (with a limit of 24 hours for serous and synovial fluids and 4 hours for CSF) and within 2 hours between both instruments. For the comparison of Yumizen H2500 versus reference method (manual microscopy), the study was performed in 2 US sites collecting 58 samples: 34 serous fluids (Ascites, Pleural, Peritoneal, Pericardial), 12 synovial fluids and 12 CSF fluids. Two qualified morphology examiners made the manual microscopy analysis and the average of the results of the 2 slide readings was used for the analysis.ResultsConsidering all types of body fluids, the H2500/XN results are very well correlated for BFWBC (0.969), BFRBC (0.999), BFMN% (0.912), BFMN# (0.89), BFPN% (0.912), BFPN# (0.97). Similarly, the statistical analysis per body fluids type shows very good correlation. For serous type, all results are higher than 0.876, for synovial type all results are higher than 0.879 and for cerebrospinal fluids type, all results are higher than 0.788. Among all samples, less than 8 samples (<2%) were out of the 95% interval. The comparison Yumizen H2500 versus manual microscopy, all the correlation results (r2) are very good: 0,9705 for Polynuclear and 0,9742 for Mononuclear. The study demonstrated better results of Yumizen H2500 versus manual microscopy than versus XN-10 for BFPN% (0.9705 versus 0.912) and BFMN% (0.9742 versus 0.912). Among 58 samples, only 4 (6.9%) were out of the 95% interval for BFPN% and BFMN%.ConclusionsThe Yumizen H2500 results for body fluid WBC differentiation (Polynuclear and Mononuclear) are very well correlated with the results from manual slide microscopy evaluation. The comparison of the results analyzed on Yumizen H2500 and on XN does not show any significant difference.

Evaluation of bone marrow aspirates using the automated hematology analyzer Sysmex XN‐3000

Reports of Megkaryocytes and Other Nucleated Cells Differential Count in Normal Adult Bone Marrow Aspiration

[Application of Bone Marrow Biopsy Imprint in Evaluating Cellularity].

Application Evaluation on Peripheral Blood Nucleated Red Blood Cell Determination by SYSMEX XN-3000 ;automatic Blood Cell Analyzer

Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system

Performance Evaluation of a Novel Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Digital Microscopy System for the Routine Analysis of Bone Marrow Aspirates

Validation of the Sysmex XN analyser and Blood Bank mode for the quality and safety of donor blood and transfusion products

Performance Evaluation of Nucleated Red Blood Cell Count Using the Sysmex XE-2100 Automated Hematology Analyzer

Comparison Evaluation of Automated Nucleated Red Blood Cell Enumeration by Sysmex XN 1000 in Comparison With Microscopic Reference in Children Under 1 Year

Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60

Evaluation of the performance of Sysmex XE-2100 for detection of nucleated red cells in peripheral blood

Establishment and evaluation on the microscopy rule for nucleated red blood cell by SYSMEX XN-9000 automatic hematology analyzer

Development of an Artificial-Intelligence-Based Tool for Automated Assessment of Cellularity in Bone Marrow Biopsies in Ph-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Performance evaluation of the automated nucleated red blood cell count of five commercial hematological analyzers

Evaluation of immature granulocyte parameters in myeloid neoplasms assayed by Sysmex XN hematology analyzer

A-158 Multi-site verification and performance of body fluids in-between Horiba Medical Yumizen h2500 with Sysmex XN-10 automated hematology analyzers and manual microscopy for morphology assessment

Evaluation of a routine hematology analyzer for quality control of leukoreduced plasma

An Evaluation of the Sysmex NE-8000® Hematology Analyzer

Performance Assessment of Sysmex DI-60: Is Digital Morphology Analyzer Reliable for White Blood Cell Differentials in Body Fluids?

Prediction of Viable CD34 Count in Harvested Product by Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Progenitor Count of Automated Hematology Analyzer Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Counting of leukocytes in samples from G-CSF mobilized donors, leukapheresis products, and cord blood: the performances of an analyzer with dedicated profiles