Evaluation of the performance of Sysmex XE-2100 for detection of nucleated red cells in peripheral blood

Jian-feng ZHU,Li ZHANG,Bei-li WANG,Chun-yan ZHANG,Wei GUO,Bai-shen PAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2014.13.009
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the performance of Sysmex XE‐2100 analyzer for detection of nucleated red cells (NRBC) in peripheral blood .Methods Peripheral blood samples ,collected from in‐patients and out‐patients and anticoagulated by ethylene diamine tetraacetate dipotassium ,were detected by Sysmex XE‐2100 analyzer and manual method using microscope and Wright‐Giemsa stained smear .Then the results were analyzed .Results Correlation co‐efficient of the results detected by analyzer and manual method was 0 .938 4 .Among the 58 samples ,with the NRBC percentage of 0 .00% -0 .99% detected by analyzer ,there were 14 samples with NRBC percentage of 0 .00% ,detec‐ted by manual method ,accounting for 24 .1% .Among the 24 samples ,with the NRBC percentage of 0 .00% detected by analyzer ,there were 22 sampels with NRBC percentage less than or equal with 1 .00% ,accounting for 91 .2% .The reproducibility of analyzer was better than manual method ,and the coefficient of variability of the former was 8 .0% . Conclusion There could be fine correlation between the Syxmex XE‐2100 analyzer and manual method .The repro‐ducibility of analyzer might be better than manual method .A few samples could be with different results ,detected by analyzer and manual method ,but the analyzer could supply warning flag to perform manual review .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?