Abstract:Judicial review, as a form of external supervision, can effectively improve the lack of self-supervision by administrative subjects. Obviously improper as one of the circumstances of administrative behavior, the definition of the academic community, and the “Administrative Procedure Law” and its judicial interpretation of the lack of clear definitions and application standards, resulting in the court in the judicial practice of the application of “obviously improper” as the basis for review of the standard is not uniform and inconsistent application of the problem, judges and Relying on their accumulated professional knowledge and practical experience to determine whether the administrative subject of the administrative act constitutes “obviously improper”, with a greater subjectivity, which may lead to administrative action as well as the judicial trial of the phenomenon of the same case, undermining the impartiality and authority of the judiciary, not conducive to the construction of the rule of law, the rule of law government. Therefore, in order to solve the above problems, the need for the meaning of clearly improper and its judgment standards, standardize the “clearly improper” the scope of application of the basis for review, the establishment of a unified standard of judicial review, but also to continue to improve the administrative case guidance system. Therefore, clarifying its criteria is of great significance to the people’s courts in correctly adjudicating administrative cases to safeguard the lawful rights and interests of citizens and legal persons, and also helps to standardize the criteria for judicial review, and to regulate and limit administrative power.

On the Perfection and Development of the System of Administrative Litigation--the Conception of Revising the Administrative Procedure Law

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

The Possibility of Reconciliation in Administrative Procedure in Legal Criterion——A Perspective of Legal Interpretation

On the Review Standard of Administrative Litigation in International Trade

On Reflection and System Reconstruction of Anti-judicial Orientation of Administrative Reconsideration Procedure

On Administrative Litigation Of International Trade From Multiple Perspectives

Judicial Review System in Perspective of State Governance System Modernization--Improving Current Administrative Procedure Law as Center

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Principles of Judicial Examination on WTO Agreements and Response to Supervision in Administrative Litigation

Orientation and Prospect of Administrative Reconsideration System in New Era