Abstract:The concept of service government has gradually been universal after the high-tide of the western countries' Reinventing Government Movements since 1980. Under the guidance of service idea, administrative organ and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks determine the forms and types of procedure with discretion in order to accomplish the administrative tasks better. On the one hand, the exercises of procedure discretion make a fuzzy bound between different administrative functions, and also destroy the application premises of the strict principle of legal reservation. In modern administration, intervention administration and supply administration often cooperate with each other perfectly to accomplish the hard administrative tasks flexibly. So it is unadvisable to defend the traditional absolute differentiation between intervention administration and supply administration and to apply the strict principle of legal reservation. On the other hand, the exercises of procedure discretion generate a new phenomenon that several administrative actions achieve one administrative target, which disclose the deficiency of the single administrative action form as the main analytical mean in administrative law. Hence the traditional theory of administrative law, which stereotypes administrative action and then judges its legality according to its constitutive requirements, will obstruct the dynamic administrative process artificially, and will obstruct the court to consider the whole and compound administrative actions comprehensively. To analyze this new type of administrative activity, we should not only abide by the law, but also pay attention to the guidance of the administrative purpose, which requires us to consider the whole administrative process with several administrative actions as dynamic administrative legal relationship, and to explore the compound legal status of administrative organs and other subjects who undertake the administrative tasks and administrative counterparts in interactive and pluralistic relationship. The legality of each administrative action should also be judged in dynamic administrative legal relationship.

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Legislative Perfection of Administration Responsibility System

Discourse on the Legislative Improvement of China Administrative Approval System

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

Preliminary Study on Public Property Legislation in China

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Sound Governance in Administrative Legislation

Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Should the Principle of Mediation Be Established in Administrative Litigation

Procedure Discretion under Service Idea and its Regulation…

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

The Analysis of the Untoward Circumstances and Routes of Administrative Policy-Making by Legal System in China

Legislation of SEA in China:Problems and Solutions——Based on the Comparative Research between China and USA

Environmental Legislation in China: Achievements, Challenges and Trends

Understanding the Cases of Dilemma of Administrative Enforcement in China

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China